Research on the legal framework for the judicial assistance in the fields of the civil law between Japan and Korea

日韩民法领域司法协助法律框架研究

• 批准号: 12420008
• 负责人: WATANABE Satoshi
• 金额: $ 7.1万
• 依托单位: Osaka University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12420008/
• 关键词: International Jurisdiction; Hague Draft Convention; Revised Korean Private International Law; International legal assistance; Service of judicial documents abroad; Taking evidence abroad; Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments; Internatio

1. Revised Korean Code of conflict of laws contains the general provision on the jurisdiction which is remarkably influenced by the U.S. principle of minimum contacts and reasonableness. But, as clarified in the discussion on Hague Draft Convention, the provisions of the jurisdiction in the international instruments should be constructed with the clear criteria. 2. Cooperation for the service of documents was the urgent and important problem at the beginning of this research project, but after the start of this project, as Korea has joined the Hague Service Convention, the main problems, concerning with the service of documents have resolved. 3. Promoting the cooperation for taking evidence abroad is mostly beneficial and expect worth for the two countries, especially the legal assistance for the. request of investigation which is known only in our two civil procedure law systems.4. As for the cooperation for the recognition and enforcement of judgments, no difficult burden exists between two countries with the court judgments. Simplification of the enforcement proceeding and widening the objects of recognition to the provisional orders and the mediation are expected. 5. Development of the international arbitration system for the disputes on the intellectual property rights is most expected, as the international disputes resolution instruments which could be free from the territorialism of these rights.

1.修订后的《韩国冲突法》对管辖权作了一般性规定，这一规定明显受到美国最低限度接触原则和合理性原则的影响。但是，正如在对海牙公约草案的讨论中所阐明的那样，国际文书中关于管辖权的规定应当有明确的标准。2.文件送达合作是本研究项目开始时迫切而重要的问题，但在本项目开始后，由于韩国加入了海牙送达公约，有关文件送达的主要问题已经解决。3.加强两国在境外取证方面的合作，尤其是在对外国人的法律的协助方面，对两国都是有益的，也是值得期待的。侦查请求权是我国两大民事诉讼法体系所特有的.在判决承认和执行方面的合作，两国之间不存在法院判决难以负担的问题。预计将简化执行程序，并将承认的对象扩大到临时命令和调解。5.知识产权纠纷的国际仲裁制度的发展是人们最期待的，因为它可以成为摆脱知识产权地域性的国际纠纷解决工具。

项目成果

道垣内 正人: "The Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from a Japanese Perspective"国際私法年報. 3号. 80-118 (2001)

Masato Michigakiuchi：“从日本的角度看海牙民商事管辖权和外国判决公约草案”国际私法年度报告第 3. 80-118 号（2001 年）。

野村 美明: "米国の裁判管轄ルールからみたハーグ管轄判決条約と日本の立場"国際私法年報. 4号. 214-271 (2002)

野村义明：《海牙管辖权公约和从美国管辖权规则角度看日本的立场》国际私法年度报告，第 4 期，第 214-271 号（2002 年）。

野村美明: "米国の裁判管轄ルールからみたハーグ管轄判決条約案と日本の立場"国際私法年報. 4号. 214-271 (2003)

野村义明：《从美国管辖权规则和日本立场角度看海牙管辖权和判决公约》国际私法年度报告第 4. 214-271 号（2003 年）。

渡邊惺之: "インターネットによる国際的な民事紛争と裁判"高橋・松井編『インターネットと法(第2版)』(有斐閣). 281-317 (2002)

Atsuyuki Watanabe：“通过互联网进行的国际民事纠纷和审判”，高桥和松井编辑，“互联网与法律（第 2 版）”（Yuhikaku）281-317（2002 年）。

渡辺 惺之: "ヨーロッパの管轄ルールからみたハーグ管轄判決条約と日本の立場"国際私法年報. 4号. 174-213 (2002)

Atsuyuki Watanabe：“从欧洲管辖权规则的角度看海牙管辖权公约和日本的立场”国际私法年度报告，第 4. 174-213 号（2002 年）。