Conflict Strategies in Innovation Markets (1850-1990)

创新市场中的冲突策略（1850-1990）

• 批准号: 461383753
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Louis Pahlow
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Neuere und Neueste Rechtsgeschichte, Zivilrecht und Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Scientific Networks
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/461383753?language=en
• 关键词: Conflict; Strategies; Innovation; Markets; 1850

Innovation-based markets play an important role in economic research, which is now also concerned with the strategic instrumentalization of industrial property rights and related competitive positions. At the latest, the long-standing legal dispute between Apple and Samsung has made it clear to a broad public that legal positions such as patents or design rights can also result in substantial conflicts, the economic consequences of which can hardly be ignored, not only for the companies that are involved, but also for the economy as a whole. The present network initiative therefore aims to place conflicts between market actors and the mechanisms for their resolution at the center of a historical-interdisciplinary discourse. The object of investigation will be disputes over industrial property rights (including patents, trademarks, design rights) as well as related concepts of protection (such as the cartel and competition regime), which, during the period under study between 1850 and 1990, lead us to expect valid findings on the triggering, settlement and management of conflicts. The aim of the network applied for here is to enable an interdisciplinary exchange for the present topic area in order to make visible differences and desiderata, but also overlaps and synergies in the respective disciplines. The network should thereby firstly contribute to sharpening conflict strategies as an object of economic and corporate history and legal history and thereby facilitate an interdisciplinary exchange. Such a profiling also serves a necessary objectification of the topic, which has been and will be strongly charged in the current public discourse. Secondly, the network is to develop a methodological offer at the interfaces of the historical subdisciplines mentioned above in order to establish conflict strategies as a common field of research in which commonalities and overlaps are made visible and usable, but also methodological differences are specified in order to exploit the potential of the research field for academic, but also public debate. At the forefront of the network is the question of how companies managed conflicts under competitive conditions, what instruments they used to do so, and how they integrated the resulting consequences into their business activities. In this way, the network aims not only to define the subject matter of conflicts or their categorization in innovation markets, but also to help decipher strategies for dealing with them.

以创新为基础的市场在经济研究中发挥着重要作用，而经济研究现在也关注工业产权的战略工具化和相关的竞争地位。最新，苹果和三星之间长期存在的法律的纠纷让广大公众清楚地认识到，专利或设计权等法律的立场也可能导致实质性的冲突，其经济后果难以忽视，不仅对涉事公司，对整个经济也是如此。因此，本网络倡议旨在将市场参与者之间的冲突及其解决机制置于历史跨学科话语的中心。调查的对象将是工业产权（包括专利、商标、设计权）以及相关的保护概念（如卡特尔和竞争制度）方面的争端，在1850年至1990年的研究期间，这些争端使我们期望得到关于冲突的触发、解决和管理的有效调查结果。这里申请的网络的目的是使本专题领域的跨学科交流，以使可见的差异和必要的，但也重叠和协同作用，在各自的学科。因此，该网络首先应有助于加强冲突战略，作为经济和企业史和法律的史的对象，从而促进跨学科的交流。这种定性也是对这一主题的必要客观化，这一主题已经并将在当前的公共讨论中受到强烈抨击。第二，该网络将在上述历史分支学科的界面上提供方法，以便将冲突战略确定为一个共同的研究领域，其中共同点和重叠是可见的和可用的，但方法上的差异也是具体的，以便开发研究领域的学术潜力，但也公开辩论。该网络的最前沿问题是公司如何在竞争条件下管理冲突，他们使用什么工具来这样做，以及他们如何将由此产生的后果整合到其业务活动中。通过这种方式，该网络的目标不仅是确定冲突的主题或在创新市场中对其进行分类，而且还帮助破译处理冲突的战略。