Philosophical and Ethical Research on "Relationship and Unrelatedness" from the Perspective of Time and Relativism

我从时间和相对主义的角度考察了“关系与非关系”的一些哲学和伦理问题。关于时间，我讨论了J.M.E. McTaggart关于时间的非实在性的证明，以及“未来是虚无”的问题，以及过去的“过去性”。关于相对主义，我讨论了普罗泰戈里“人是万物的尺度”的学说，以及相对主义是相对化和绝对化的重复过程。我从三个方面对麦克塔格特的“矛盾”进行了更新，并对时间实在性的概念进行了一些修改。我的解释表明，三个更新的“矛盾”提供了时间的实在性（而不是时间的非实在性）的适当概念。虽然过去和未来的概念是不对称的，但它们都与虚无密切相关。这两种虚无的区别是什么？我已经提出了一些关于过去的虚无和未来的虚无的区别。我试图把普罗泰哥的理论从苏格拉底的解释中解放出来。我已经表明，普罗泰戈里理论（相对主义）的范围比迄今为止所认为的要广泛得多。我的结论是，相对主义的问题与绝对区域（“我们”）和“我们”的相对化（过去和未来的虚无）之间的“关系和不相关”的概念有关。

From the perspective of time and relativism, I have investigated some of the philosophical and ethical problems of "Relationship and Unrelatedness". Regarding time, I have discussed J.M.E. McTaggart's proof of the unreality of time, and the question of what the "future is nothing" means, as well as the "pastness" of the past. Regarding relativism, I have discussed the doctrine from Protagorean theory that "man is the measure of all things", and relativism as a process of the repetition of relativization and absolutization.I have updated McTaggart's "contradiction" in three ways, and offered some modifications on the idea of the reality of time. My interpretation suggests that three updated "contradictions" offer an appropriate notion of the reality of time (not the unreality of time). Although the ideas of the past and the future are asymmetric, both are profoundly concerned with nothingness. What is the difference between these two kinds of nothingness? I have presented a number of differences that pertain between the nothingness of the past and that of the future.I have tried to liberate Protagorean theory from the Socratic interpretation. I have shown that the scope of Protagorean theory (relativism) is much wider than has been thought to be the case thus far. I have concluded that the problem of relativism is connected to the idea of "relationship and unrelatedness" between the absolute zone ("WE") and the relativization of "WE" by the nothingness of past and future.