International transfer of the workfare programs-the United Kingdome and Canada from the United States-

我的研究结果有以下几点。首先，明确了劳动福利是一项不局限于美国的全球政策，并包含了发达福利国家斯堪的纳维亚国家。其次，在统计数据的基础上，对美式劳动福利政策的内容进行了分析，并明确了结果和限制。第三，加拿大试图模仿美国的福利改革，推行劳动福利政策，但在政治上和社会上都遇到了很大的困难。第四，英国虽然模仿美国等国家的劳动福利政策，实施了新政，但在内容和管理要点等方面与美国有很大的不同。最后，福利政策是全球主义迫使世界上每个国家进行的不可逆转的结构性改革的一部分。此外，本研究还指出，英国、美国和加拿大三个国家的福利政策目标不同。例如，美国的工作福利政策的目标是被认为是不应得的穷人，即单亲母亲家庭的受抚养儿童家庭援助的接受者。另一方面，老年人、盲人、残疾人等福利受惠者被视为应得贫困者，并没有成为福利政策的对象，成为福利受惠者的资格已经作为一种权利得到了保障。换句话说，尽管美国确实规定了一些严格的要求，比如终身福利限制、强制参与和制裁，但它的目标仅限于完全单身的母亲。因此，不能说美国的福利政策比目标更广的英国和加拿大更严厉。美国、英国、加拿大等国家虽然实行了劳动福利政策，但领取福利者的人数有所减少，但并不能帮助退休者自力更生，反而增加了临时就业和兼职就业，使劳动市场变得不稳定。少

My research result is the following points. First, it was clarified that the workfare was a global policy of no limit to the United States, and containing Scandinavia nations that were an advanced welfare states. Secondarily, contents of the American type workfare policy were analyzed based on the statistical data, and the result and the limit were clarified. Thirdly, Canada faced the great difficulty politically and socially though it tried to imitate the welfare reform of the United States and to introduce the workfare policy. Fourthly, though Britain imitates the workfare policy of the United States and other nations and executed the New Deal, it was very different from the United States in the content and the point of management etc. Finally, the workfare policy composed a part of the irreversible structural reforms that globalism had been compelling to every country in the world. Moreover, this research pointed out that the object of the workfare policy was different in three coun … More tries of Britain, United States and Canada. For instance, the target of the American workfare policy was the Aid for Families with Dependent Children recipient thought to be the undeserving poor, that is, single mother family. On the other hand, the welfare recipient like the aged, the blind and a handicapped person are regarded as the deserving poor, and did not become the target of the workfare policy, and the qualification to be a welfare recipient had been secured as an entitlement. In other words, though the United States was certainly obligating a tough requirement like the lifelong time limit benefit, the compulsory participation, and the sanction, its target had been limited to entirely single mother. Therefore, it cannot necessarily be said that the workfare policy of the United States is tougher than that of Britain and Canada where the target is wider. Though the number of welfare recipients in the United States, Britain, and Canada decreased by introducing the workfare policy, it was not able to help the self-support of the welfare leaver, increased a temporary employment and part-time employment, and made labor market unstable. Less