权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

International transfer of the workfare programs-the United Kingdome and Canada from the United States-

工作福利计划的国际转移 - 从美国到英国和加拿大 -

基本信息

批准号：
15530189
负责人：
ARAI Mitsuyoshi
金额：
$ 1.79万
依托单位：
Saitama University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15530189/
关键词：
workfare policy welfare to work policy work first approach human capital development approach self-support of welfare leaver family Ontario Works New Deal for Young People New Labour 勤労福祉ウィスコンシン・モデル勤労最優先(労働力化重視)手法福祉離脱世帯の経済的自立カナ

项目摘要

My research result is the following points. First, it was clarified that the workfare was a global policy of no limit to the United States, and containing Scandinavia nations that were an advanced welfare states. Secondarily, contents of the American type workfare policy were analyzed based on the statistical data, and the result and the limit were clarified. Thirdly, Canada faced the great difficulty politically and socially though it tried to imitate the welfare reform of the United States and to introduce the workfare policy. Fourthly, though Britain imitates the workfare policy of the United States and other nations and executed the New Deal, it was very different from the United States in the content and the point of management etc. Finally, the workfare policy composed a part of the irreversible structural reforms that globalism had been compelling to every country in the world. Moreover, this research pointed out that the object of the workfare policy was different in three coun … More tries of Britain, United States and Canada. For instance, the target of the American workfare policy was the Aid for Families with Dependent Children recipient thought to be the undeserving poor, that is, single mother family. On the other hand, the welfare recipient like the aged, the blind and a handicapped person are regarded as the deserving poor, and did not become the target of the workfare policy, and the qualification to be a welfare recipient had been secured as an entitlement. In other words, though the United States was certainly obligating a tough requirement like the lifelong time limit benefit, the compulsory participation, and the sanction, its target had been limited to entirely single mother. Therefore, it cannot necessarily be said that the workfare policy of the United States is tougher than that of Britain and Canada where the target is wider. Though the number of welfare recipients in the United States, Britain, and Canada decreased by introducing the workfare policy, it was not able to help the self-support of the welfare leaver, increased a temporary employment and part-time employment, and made labor market unstable. Less

我的研究结果是以下几点。首先，它澄清了工作福利是一项全球政策，不限于美国，并包含斯堪的纳维亚国家是一个先进的福利国家。其次，以统计数据为基础，对美国式工作福利政策的内容进行了分析，明确了美国式工作福利政策的效果和局限性。第三，加拿大试图模仿美国的福利改革，推行工作福利政策，但在政治和社会上都遇到了很大的困难。第四，英国虽然仿效美国等国的工作福利政策，实行新政，但在内容、管理要点等方面与美国有很大的不同。最后，工作福利政策是全球化迫使世界各国进行的不可逆转的结构改革的一部分。此外，本研究还指出，三个国家的工作福利政策的目标是不同的， ...更多信息英国、美国和加拿大的尝试。例如，美国工作福利政策的对象是被认为是不值得的穷人，即单身母亲家庭的受抚养子女家庭援助。另一方面，老年人、盲人和残疾人等福利领取者被视为应得的穷人，没有成为工作福利政策的对象，成为福利领取者的资格被视为一种权利。换句话说，虽然美国确实有义务执行终身时限福利、强制参与和制裁等坚韧要求，但其目标仅限于完全单身的母亲。因此，美国的工作福利政策不一定比英国和加拿大的政策更严厉，因为英国和加拿大的政策针对的对象更广泛。美国、英国、加拿大等国通过推行工作福利政策，虽然减少了领取福利者的数量，但却无法帮助福利离职者实现自立，增加了临时就业和非全日制就业，使劳动力市场不稳定。少

项目成果

期刊论文数量（5）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

アメリカ型勤労福祉制度の成果と限界

美国式劳工福利制度的成就与局限性

DOI：
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
経済学研究(九州大学経済学会) 第69巻3.4合併号
影响因子：
0
作者：
Ueno;Hiroshi;宮下國生;Eiichi Tomiura;宮下國生;塩原俊彦;上野宏;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;宮下國生;Tomiura Eiichi;Katayama Seiichi;Tomiura Eiichi;新井光吉
通讯作者：
新井光吉

勤労福祉政策の国際展開-アメリカからイギリス、カナダへ-

劳工福利政策的国际发展——从美国到英国和加拿大——

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
Ueno;Hiroshi;宮下國生;Eiichi Tomiura;宮下國生;塩原俊彦;上野宏;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;宮下國生;Tomiura Eiichi;Katayama Seiichi;Tomiura Eiichi;新井光吉;宮下國生;T.Shiobara;Aral Mitsuyoshi;Seiichi Katayama;塩原俊彦;Kunio Miyashita;上野宏;Katayama Seiichi;新井光吉
通讯作者：
新井光吉

Result and limit of American workfare

美国工作福利的结果及限额