Potential of remedial judgement from the view point of negotiation-facilitating norms-in cases of continual consumer contracts-

在本研究计画中，收集了持续消费者契约冲突的案例，并探讨这些关系的基本规则与原则。解决消费者合同冲突的法律的技能在日常生活冲突案件的背景下是重要的，但机构的观点也是必不可少的，以设计和解释双方同意的法规和合同规则。有两个规范性原则构成这些观点的规范性基础。一是所谓的“权利主义”，二是所谓的“福利主义”。本文结合一些合同冲突案例，阐述了这两个基本原则的重要性。在此基础上，发表了四篇论文：《摆脱家长式的赋权》、《法律的主体的下落》、《当代侵权理论中的福利与权利》、《竞争秩序与合同法理论--福利与权利的一个方面》。

In this research program, conflict cases of continual consumer contracts are collected and basic rules and principles which govern these relationships are inquired. Legal skills to solve the consumer contract conflicts are important in the context of everyday life conflict cases but institutional view points are also essential to design and interpret statues and contract rules which both parties agreed to. There are two normative principles which configure normative foundations of these viewpoints. One is so-called "rights-theory" and another is "welfarism" This reseach explicate the importance of these two basic principles in relation to some contract conflict cases. Based on the research four articles are published; "empowerment free from paternalism", "the whereabouts of legal subjects", "welfare vs. rights in contemporary torts theory", and "competition order and contract law theory-an aspect of welfare vs. rights".