权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Public choice analysis for the behaviors of bureaucrats, political parties and interest groups around food policies

官僚、政党和利益集团围绕粮食政策的行为的公共选择分析

基本信息

批准号：
15580192
负责人：
ARAHATA Katsumi
金额：
$ 2.05万
依托单位：
Gifu University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15580192/
关键词：
rice set-aside program uneven allocation iron triangle food safety policy risk analysis endogenous tariff determination politician-led agricultural policy Bureaucrat-led agricultural policy 米転作良質米奨励金派官僚行動出世動機公共選択利益団体官僚

项目摘要

Three major findings of this research are as follows :Firstly, although the methodology of the analysis based upon the public choice theory was established, assuming the political situation in the U.S., it can effectively be applied to that in Japan. Especially concerned with the matters around food policies, it is found to be helpful to clarify and unravel the intricacies of political economy.Secondly, with regard to the rice set-aside program, focusing on the newly proposed system, the Cooperatives-led production adjustment system, political feasibility is examined, considering the outcome of the past experiences of set-aside programs. Holding opinions of farmers and hamlets in esteem is often appreciated, however, it is concluded that such esteem may cause inefficient resource allocation. Rather, simply proportionate allocation of set-aside acreage or proportionate allocation depend upon supply-and -demand balance can be more appropriate.Thirdly, Food safety issues are controversial and the relationship between scientific knowledge and political judgments is often contended. Although the BSE problem may only be focused on, various resources of food borne risks were comparatively investigated in this research. AS a result, there can be observed that various resources are focused on alternately. According to the theoretical analysis, it is suggested that the behaviors of politicians and bureaucrats may both enlarge emotional fluctuation of consumers' food scares.

本研究的主要发现有三点：第一，虽然基于公共选择理论的分析方法是建立在假设美国政治形势的基础上的，但它可以有效地适用于日本的政治形势。特别是有关粮食政策的问题，它被发现有助于澄清和解开政治经济学的错综复杂。其次，在大米储备计划方面，着眼于新提出的合作社主导的生产调整制度，考虑到过去储备计划的经验结果，对政治可行性进行了审查。尊重农民和村庄的观点经常得到赞赏，但结论是这种尊重可能导致资源配置效率低下。相反，简单地按比例分配预留面积或按比例分配取决于供需平衡可能更合适。第三，食品安全问题是有争议的，科学知识和政治判断之间的关系经常被争论。虽然可能只是关注疯牛病问题，但本研究对食源性风险的各种来源进行了比较调查。因此，可以观察到各种资源交替被关注。理论分析表明，政治家和官僚的行为都可能放大消费者食品恐慌的情绪波动。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（22）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

食品安全収策の政治過程に関する公共選択論的接近

食品安全政策政治进程的公共选择方法

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
フードシステム研究 12巻・2号
影响因子：
0
作者：
Katsumi Arahata;Katsumi Arahata;Katsumi Arahata;荒幡克己;Katsumi Arahata;荒幡克己;Katsumi Arahata;Katsumi Arahata;Katsumi Arahata;荒幡克己
通讯作者：
荒幡克己

米生産調整の政治経済学

水稻生产调整的政治经济学