The genealogy and the present practice of the "dogmatic method"

“教条方法”的谱系与现状

• 批准号: 16530010
• 负责人: SASAKURA Hideo
• 金额: $ 1.92万
• 依托单位: Waseda University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2006
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16530010/
• 关键词: natural law theory; pandecten science; Roman law; legal principles; 近世自然法; 体系的思考; 法原理; EU法; ratio legis; 人文主義法学; 法原則

The main object of this project is to describe the genealogy and the present practice of the "dogmatic method" in legal science.In German private law science of the 19th century, scholars tried to find out some "key-principles of positive laws", and starting from these principles, they constructed systematic theory of law. They believed that if they succeed in this systematical reconstruction, they will be able to obtain the correct understanding of the laws. They also believed that they can cover all defects in legislation by deducing correct directions from their legal system. Because these legal scientists went too far in relaying on the logical consistency and thus neglected to evaluate the practical meaning of their legal construction, they were soon criticized as "Begriffsjurisprudenz".According to my research so far, the method of this dogmatic science is still in use in our legal science and there are some advantages in applying it. Because it makes us for example free from the book stab application of laws ; the legal principles and maxims lead us to think laws more dynamically, as Ronald Dworkin stresses it.On this account, I tried in the years 2004-2006, firstly, to understand how this way of handling laws developed among so-called modern natural law scholars under the influence of Cartesian and Hobbesean philosophy. I studied, secondly, the 19th century German lawyers focusing on how they developed this way of thinking based on the philosophical tradition of Christian Wolff, Kant and Hegel. I also compared this type of legal science with those in the ancient Rome and the Middle Ages.Based on this research, I have completed my book "History of Western Legal Ideas", that will be published in September 2007

本课题的主要研究对象是描述法律的科学中“独断法”的谱系和实践现状。在世纪的德国私法科学中，学者们试图找出一些“实在法的核心原则”，并从这些原则出发，构建系统的法学理论。他们认为，如果他们成功地进行了这种系统的重建，他们就能够获得对法律的正确理解。他们还认为，他们可以通过从他们的法律的体系中推导出正确的方向来弥补立法中的所有缺陷。由于这些法律的科学家过分依赖逻辑的一致性，从而忽视了评价其法律的建构的实践意义，他们很快就被批评为“Begriffsprudenz”，根据我迄今的研究，这种教条主义的科学方法在我们的法律的科学中仍然在使用，并且应用它有一些好处。法律;正如罗纳德德沃金所强调的那样，法律的原则和准则引导我们更加动态地思考法律。2基于此，我在2004-2006年期间首先试图了解这种处理法律的方式是如何在笛卡尔和霍布斯哲学的影响下在所谓的现代自然法学者中发展起来的。其次，我研究了19世纪世纪的德国律师，重点是他们如何在克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫、康德和黑格尔的哲学传统基础上发展这种思维方式。在此基础上，我完成了《西方法律的思想史》一书，将于2007年9月出版

项目成果

法思想史講義

法律思想史讲座

• 发表时间: 2007
• 作者: 吉田 正志;吉 田 正 志;YOSHIDA Masashi;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広瀬 清吾;広渡 清吾;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Hideo Sasakura;笹倉秀夫
• 通讯作者: 笹倉秀夫

History of Western Legal Ideas

西方法律思想史

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: Tokyo Univ. Press
• 作者: 吉田 正志;吉 田 正 志;YOSHIDA Masashi;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;広渡 清吾;広渡 清吾;広瀬 清吾;広渡 清吾;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Seigo Hirowatari;Hideo Sasakura
• 通讯作者: Hideo Sasakura