A Comprehensive Study on the Process of Injunction in the Administrative Litigation

行政诉讼中的禁令程序综合研究

• 批准号: 16530025
• 负责人: OKADA Masanori
• 金额: $ 1.09万
• 依托单位: Nanzan University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2005
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16530025/
• 关键词: injunction; administrative litigation; prevention of noise; suit for general performance; revised administrative litigation law; public power; civil process and administrative process; suit for prohibition; 差止訴訟; 行政事件訴訟法

(1) On the injunction system in the Japanese administrative litigation law I have published an article "Procedural Provisions in the Revised Administrative Litigation Law and the Right of Access to the Courts" (in THE HOURITSU JIHOU vol. 77 No. 3, 2005). And then my study focused on the concept of exercise of public power, which Japanese courts apply in order to exclude injunctions of civil procedure.(2) On the concept of "exercise of public power", I analyzed firstly its historical basis. Articles on this theme are "Tort Liability of the State in the Establishing Era of the Meiji Constitutional System: State Immunity Discipline and the Concept of Public Power(1)-(5)" (in NANZAN LAW REVIEW from vol. 28, No. 4 to vol. 31 No. 3, 2005-7). I gave already a lecture about an outline of these articles were already in a symposium of the Japan Democratic Scientist Society (Division of Law) and summary of this lecture is the article in the journal of this academic society "Science in Law" No. 37 … More . Secondly I examined the concepts of "GYOUSEI-SHOBUN" and "GYOUSEI-KOUI". Both of them mean "administrative action", which is a typical example of "exercise of public power". As a result of my study, I explicated the difference of historical origin of these concepts (former meant originally "administrative measure") and a cause of today's theoretical confusion, which is brought by identifying these two. In other words, because of this confusion Japanese courts deny a series of action for prevention against plane noise, for no other reason than that an action of this kind neither civil nor administrative action.(3) An article on the injunction system in German law will be also appeared in 2006. I examine in this article into the cases and litigation systems of mandamus proceeding or injunction to permitted establishments or facilities, which should pass the criteria in environmental and town planning acts, to non-permitted, which are exempted from regulatory provisions, and to military installations. On the basis of suggestions of these litigation systems, I will propose theoretical and institutional ideas on procedure, object of suit, and effects of judicial decision : I have pointed out a part of these ideas in the Dokkyo International Forum 2005.In addition to these studies from a viewpoint of comparative law, I prepare a Japanese version of H.-J. KOCH (ed.), "UMWELTRECHT" (2002, Luchterhand), which will be published in 2008.(4) In relation to this study theme I have reviewed decisions of courts. Results of this review are reports in THE HOUGAKU SEMINAR since April 2004. Less

(1)关于日本行政诉讼法中的禁制令制度，我曾发表文章《修改后的行政诉讼法中的程序规定与诉诸法院的权利》（载于《小时时事》2005年第77期第3期）。然后我的研究集中在公共权力行使的概念上，日本法院运用它来排除民事诉讼的禁令。(2)关于“公权力行使”的概念，首先分析了它的历史基础。有关这一主题的文章有《明治宪制建立时期的国家侵权责任：国家豁免纪律与公权力概念（一）—（五）》（见《南山法律评论》2005- 2007年第28卷第4期至第31卷第3期）。我已经讲过这些文章的大纲已经在日本民主科学家协会（法律部门）的一个研讨会上发表了这次讲座的总结发表在这个学术协会的期刊《法律科学》第37期…更多。其次，我考察了“GYOUSEI-SHOBUN”和“GYOUSEI-KOUI”的概念。两者的意思都是“行政行为”，是“公权力行使”的典型例子。通过我的研究，我阐明了这两个概念（前者原意为“行政措施”）的历史渊源的差异以及今天理论混乱的原因，这是通过对两者的识别而带来的。换句话说，由于这种混乱，日本法院拒绝了一系列防止飞机噪音的诉讼，没有别的理由，只是因为这种诉讼既不是民事诉讼，也不是行政诉讼。(3) 2006年还将发表一篇关于德国法律中的禁令制度的文章。在这篇文章中，我研究了强制令程序或禁令的案例和诉讼制度，包括允许的场所或设施，应该通过环境和城市规划法的标准，不允许的，不受监管规定的限制，以及军事设施。我将以这些诉讼制度的建议为基础，对诉讼程序、诉讼对象、司法判决效果等方面提出理论和制度上的构想，并在“2005年Dokkyo国际论坛”上提出部分构想。除了从比较法的角度进行这些研究外，我还准备了一份日本版的h - j。科赫（编），“人类的生存”（2002,Luchterhand），将于2008年出版。(4)关于这一研究主题，我回顾了法院的判决。本综述的结果已于2004年4月在THE HOUGAKU研讨会上发表。少

项目成果

行政処分・行政行為の概念史と行政救済法の課題

行政处分和行政行为的概念史以及行政救济法的挑战

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 法律時報 79巻9号
• 作者: 尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

Legal Protection System for Natural Environment in Germany and Japan : From a Viewpoint of Ccfmparative Law

德国和日本的自然环境法律保护体系:基于比较法的视角

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: The Annual Report of Dokkyo International Exchange Centre No.19

明治憲法体制確立期における国の不法行為責任(1)

明治宪政制度建立过程中的国家侵权责任（一）

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: 南山法学 28巻4号
• 作者: 岡田正則;岡田正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

明治憲法体制確立期における国の不法行為責任(3)

明治宪政制度建立过程中的国家侵权责任（三）

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 南山法学 30巻1号
• 作者: 尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;OKADA Masanori;OKADA Masapori;岡田 正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

「公権力の行使」は主権(統治権)の行使と同義か

“行使公共权力”是否等于行使主权（治理权）？

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: 法学セミナー 50巻7号
• 作者: 岡田正則;岡田正則;岡田 正則;OKADA Masanori;岡田正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田正則