A Study on Administrative Procedure and Information System from the Viewpoint of Right to Social Security

社会保障权视角下的行政程序与信息系统研究

• 批准号: 11620021
• 负责人: OKADA Masanori
• 金额: $ 0.96万
• 依托单位: Nanzan University (2000-2001)Kanazawa University (1999)
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11620021/
• 关键词: administrative procedure; social security; administrative litigation; reform of judicial system; object of administrative litigation; market failure; deregulation; social welfare service; 社会保障法; 行政争訟; 司法改革; 権利; 立憲主義; 制度; 市場; 社会保障を受ける権利; 福祉

1. If administrative bodies would play its role in the social security by means of contract system of civil law, they must introduce not only those systems, in which they support the adequate supply of services by private sectors, supervise the quality of the services and eliminate the barriers against the beneficiary of services, give adequate information about the services, and help the beneficiary of services to bargain with these undertaking bodies, but also those procedural conditions of contracts, which take the characteristics of legal relation in social security into consideration.2. A systematic statute of administrative procedure for social securities should be provided. Following points are elemental : estoppel-principle, notification of the detailed reason for the administrative decisions, inquiry into the matter, factfinding, duty of administrative agencies to advise about remedial procedures and to give information about the administrative decision, adjustment procedure in case of mistake of administrative decision (esp. overpayment of benefits etc.), and the advocate system in these procedures.3. On the judicial reform I came to the following conclusions. (1) Although it is undoubtedly necessary for us to reform social security procedure and process system, questions with regard to this point are ignored in current discussions on judicial reform. (2) In reforming judicial system, we must take the characteristics of social security cases into consideration. (3) From the viewpoint of right to social security, it is very important to introduce a model action system and a wide-range judicial decision system, which is Corresponding to the administrative decisions with a long-term effect, into the Japanese administrative litigation system.

1.行政机关要想通过民法契约制度在社会保障中发挥作用，不仅要引入支持私营部门充分提供服务、监督服务质量、消除服务受益者的障碍、提供充分的服务信息等制度，并帮助服务的受益人与这些承办机构进行谈判，但也包括那些具有社会保障法律的关系特征的合同程序条件.应制定一项系统的社会保障行政程序法规。以下几点是基本的：禁止反言原则、通知行政决定的详细理由、调查问题、事实调查、行政机构就补救程序提出建议和提供有关行政决定的信息的义务、在行政决定错误（特别是多付福利等）的情况下的调整程序，以及这些程序中的律师制度.关于司法改革，我得出以下结论。(1)改革社会保障程序和处理制度无疑是必要的，但在当前的司法改革讨论中，这一问题却被忽视了。(2)在司法体制改革中，必须考虑到社会保障案件的特点。(3)从社会保障权的角度看，日本行政诉讼制度中引入与具有长期效力的行政决定相对应的示范诉讼制度和广泛的司法判决制度是非常重要的。

项目成果

岡田正則: "社会保障行政争訴からみた司法制度改革の課題"社会保障法. 16号. 163-176 (2001)

冈田正德：《社会保障行政纠纷视角下的司法制度改革问题》《社会保障法》第16. 163-176号（2001）。

OKADA, Masanori: "Constitutionalism, Institution, and Free Market System"K. Urata (eds.), Constitutionalism, Democracy, and Pacifism. 215-240 (2001)

冈田正德：“宪政、制度和自由市场体系”K.

岡田正則: "行政訴訟における取消訴訟の訴訟物"新井隆一先生古稀記念『行政法と租税法の課題と展望』成文堂,所収. 3-32 (2000)

冈田正则：《行政诉讼中撤销诉讼的诉讼材料》新井龙一珍本纪念书《行政法和税法的问题与展望》西文堂，3-32（2000）

岡田正則: "社会保障争訟と司法制度改革"法の科学. 30号. (2001)

冈田正德：《社会保障纠纷与司法制度改革》法学第30期。（2001）

岡田正則: "立憲主義・制度・自由市場-権利論再考のための覚書"浦田賢治(編)『立憲主義・民主主義・平和主義』三省堂、所収. 215-240 (2001)

Masanori Okada：“宪政、制度和自由市场 - 重新考虑权利理论的备忘录”，载于 Kenji Urata（编辑），宪政、民主和和平主义，Sanseido，215-240（2001）。