Nominative/Genitive Conversion : toward a cognitive typology

主格/属格转换：走向认知类型学

• 批准号: 17520289
• 负责人: KOGUMA Takeshi
• 金额: $ 1.6万
• 依托单位: Ishikawa National College of Technology
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2006
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17520289/
• 关键词: Nominative; Genitive Conversion; Genitive Subject; Reference-point; target; Trajector; landmark; 認知モード; tr; lm alignment

The proposed analysis differs from those in previous studies in that it offers a natural and straightforward account for (a)the historical changes of subject-marking in Japanese, (b)the nature of the so-called transitivity restriction, (c)the preference for the genitive-marked subject over the nominative-marked subject that certain predicates exhibit, and (d)the so-called pragmatic relative construction.It is claimed that the distinction between no-adnominal construction and ga-adnominal construction should be characterized in terms of manner of conceptualization. It is assumed that they employ closely related but different cognitive processes. The semantic structures of the corresponding adnominal constructions are assumed to be identical except for their manner of conceptualization. This is the reason why the two different case-particles can alternate without causing a semantic contrast.It is proposed that no-adnominal construction in Japanese is best characterized in a reference-point model and demonstrates that the semantic structure of the construction is also best characterized as a manifestation of reference-point /target conceptualization (hereafter R/T conceptualization). It is claimed that no-adnominal construction reflects solely R/T conceptualization, whereas ga-adnominal construction employs conceptualization based on trajector/landmark alignment (hereafter tr/lm conceptualization), backgrounding the inherent and immanent R/T conceptualization entertained by a conceptualizer.

本文的分析与以往的研究不同之处在于，它对日语主语标记的历史变化，及物性限制的本质，某些谓语对属格标记主语的偏好，（4）语用关系构式，认为非定语构式与加定语构式的区别应根据概念化的方式来区分。据推测，他们采用密切相关，但不同的认知过程。除了概念化的方式外，相应的形容词结构的语义结构被认为是相同的。本文认为，日语中的无名词性结构最好用参照点模型来表征，并论证了该结构的语义结构也最好用参照点/目标概念化（以下简称R/T概念化）来表征。无附加名构式反映的是R/T概念化，而加附加名构式则是基于标记/界标对齐的概念化（以下简称tr/lm概念化），其背景是概念化者所接受的固有的、不可分割的R/T概念化。

项目成果

Nihongo Rentai Shuushoku-setsu no 'Ga/No' Kootai ni kansuru Ninchigengogakuteki Koosatsu : Ninchi-Moodo : R/T Ninchi vs. Tr/Lm Ninchi no Chigai no Araware [A Cognitive Approach to Nominative/ Genitive Conversion : Reference-Point/ Target Conceptualization

Nihongo Rentai Shuushoku-setsu no Ga/No Kootai ni kansuru Ninchigengogakuteki Koosatsu : Ninchi-Moodo : R/T Ninchi vs. Tr/Lm Ninchi no Chigai no Araware [主格/属格转换的认知方法：参考点/目标

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: Kansai Linguistic Society 25
• 作者: Koguma;Takeshi.
• 通讯作者: Takeshi.

認知モード転換と属格/主格交替-いわゆる他動性制約の反例および認知類型論的示唆-

认知模式切换和属格/主格交替 - 所谓及物性约束的反例和认知类型学的含义 -

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: JCLA Conference Handbook(日本認知言語学会第7回大会) 2006
• 作者: Koguma;Takeshi.;小熊 猛
• 通讯作者: 小熊 猛

日本語連体修飾節の「が/の」交替に関する認知言語学的考察山-認知モード(r/t認知 vs. tr/1m認知)の違いの現れ-

日语副词修饰从句中“ga/no”交替的认知语言学思考 - 认知模式差异的表现（r/t认知与tr/1m认知） -

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: Proceedings of Kansai Linguistic Society 25
• 作者: Koguma;Takeshi.;小熊 猛;小熊 猛
• 通讯作者: 小熊 猛

日本語連体修飾節の「が/の」交替に関する認知言語学的考察-認知モード(r/t認知vs.tr/lm認知)の違いの現れ-

关于日语副词修饰语从句中“ga/no”交替的认知语言学思考 - 认知模式差异的表现（r/t 认知与 tr/lm 认知）-

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: KLS (Proceedings of Kansai Linguistic Society関西言語学会) 25
• 作者: Koguma;Takeshi.;小熊 猛
• 通讯作者: 小熊 猛

Nominative-Genitive Conversion in Japanese : A Cognitive Grammar Approach

日语中的主格-属格转换：一种认知语法方法

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 学位論文(金沢大学)
• 作者: Harada;Kazuko I.;小熊 猛
• 通讯作者: 小熊 猛