CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES ON PROCESS ELECTING CANDIDATES IN THE MODERN PARTY STATE

现代党国选举候选人程序的宪法研究

• 批准号: 17530019
• 负责人: MOTO Hidenori
• 金额: $ 1.92万
• 依托单位: NAGOYA UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2006
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17530019/
• 关键词: PUBLIC LAW; PARTY STATE; DEMOCRACY IN PARTIES; PROCESS OF ELECTION; PROCEDURE ELECTING CANDIDATES; DEMOCRACY; PUBLIC SPHERE; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; 政党; 選挙; 候補者; 憲法; ドイツ; 結社の自由; 公共性

DURING 2 YEARS OF THE RESARCH TERM, I HAVE STUDIED ABOUT RESARCH THEME REFERING TO GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES AND THEORY MAINLY. IN THIS PROCESS, I PAID ATTENTION TO FOLLOWING POINTS: (A) COMPERATIVE STUDIES ON CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF POLITICAL PARTIES; (B) REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY ON DEMOCRACY; AND (C) PARTY DEMOCRACY BASED ON CIVIC PUBLIC SPHERE, ETC. AFTER STUDING AND WRITING ARTICLES ABOUT THESE POINTS (CF. "11. REFERENCES"), I WORKED ON THE MAIN THEME OF THE RESEARCH "CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES ON PROCESS ELECTING CANDIDATES'.AS THE RESULT OF THESE STUDIES, I HAVE FOUND OUT FOLLOWING TWO IMPORTANT POINTS : (1) IT IS NECESSARY FOR ANALYZING THE LEGAL CONTROL SYSTEM OVER THE PROCESS ELECTING CANDIDATES THAT WE SHOULD DISTINGUISH COMMON FACTORS FOR PARTY DEMOCRACY COUNTRIES AND PROPER FACTORS FOR GERMANY ; (2) MORE CONCRETELY, ON ONE HAND, AS A PROPER FOCTOR FOR GERMANY THERE IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL CONTROL OVER POLITICAL PARTIES BASED ON GERMAN HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, ON THE OTHER HAND, AS A COMMON FACTOR FOR DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES, THERE MAY BE LEGAL CONTROL OVER ELECTION PROCESS AS ITSELF 'PUBLIC' WITHOUT SPECIFIC HISTORICAL BACKGROUND. THUS I WILL GO NEXT STAGE TO REVIEW JAPANESE WAY OF APPROACH TO MIXED FIELD OF ELECTION PROCESS AND PROCEDUER WITHIN POLITICAL PARTIES FROM VIEW OF PROCEDURE WITHIN PARTIES, AUTONOMY OF PARTIES, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND TO BUILD UP THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK DEMOCRATIZING ELECTION PROCESS, REFERING TO GERMAN WAY OF APPROACH FROM VIEW OF ELECTION LAW.

在两年的留学期间，我主要参考德国的宪法案例和宪法理论来研究留学主题。在这个过程中，我注意到以下几点：（A）政党宪法地位的比较研究;（B）民主宪法理论的回顾;（C）基于公民公共领域的政党民主等。“十一。本文以《程序选举候选人的宪法研究》为研究主题，通过对这一研究，笔者发现：（1）分析程序选举候选人的法律的控制制度，必须区分政党民主国家的共性因素和德国的适宜因素;（2）更具体地说，一方面，作为德国的一个适当因素，基于德国的历史背景，对政党有宪法和法律的控制，另一方面，作为民主国家的一个共同因素，可能对选举过程本身进行法律的控制，而不需要特定的历史背景。因此，我将在下一阶段从政党程序、政党自治、结社自由的角度考察日本对政党选举过程和程序的混合领域的做法，并参照德国从选举法角度的做法，建立选举过程民主化的理论框架。

项目成果

MODERN DEMOCRACY AND 'PUBLIC SPHERE' IN TIERS : TOWARD RENEWAL OF PARTY DEMOCRACY

现代民主与层级中的“公共领域”：走向政党民主的复兴

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICS (NAGOYA UNIVERSITY) NO. 213
• 作者: MINAMIKATA;Satoshi;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;本 秀紀;本 秀紀;HIDENORI MOTO;HIDENORI MOTO
• 通讯作者: HIDENORI MOTO

現代民主政と多層的『公共圏』-政党民主政の再構築にむけて

现代民主与多层次的“公共领域”——重建政党民主

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 名古屋大学法政論集 213号
• 作者: MINAMIKATA;Satoshi;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;本 秀紀;本 秀紀
• 通讯作者: 本 秀紀

民主主義の展望-taking democracy seriously

民主的前景——认真对待民主

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 続・憲法改正問題(法律時報増刊)(全国憲法研究会編)
• 作者: MINAMIKATA;Satoshi;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;本 秀紀
• 通讯作者: 本 秀紀

PERSPECTIVE OF DEMOCRACY : TAKING DEMOCRACY SERIOUSLY

民主的视角：认真对待民主

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: JAPAN ASSOCIATION FOR STUDIES OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (ED.), SEQUEL TO PROBLEMS ON AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
• 作者: MINAMIKATA;Satoshi;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;本 秀紀;本 秀紀;HIDENORI MOTO
• 通讯作者: HIDENORI MOTO

政党条項-「憲法的編入」の意味と無意味

政党条款——“立宪”的意义与无意义

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: ジュリスト 1289号
• 作者: MINAMIKATA;Satoshi;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;南方暁;南方暁;田巻帝子;本 秀紀;本 秀紀;HIDENORI MOTO;HIDENORI MOTO;本 秀紀;本 秀紀
• 通讯作者: 本 秀紀