Transfer Protocols. Storytelling and communlcation In lntersectoral processes of urban and regional development.

走出筒仓思维”，不仅是一个流行的口号，而且在城市和区域发展中也是如此。行政、政治、商业、科学和公民社会必须寻找新的合作。但是，如何才能使部门间工作具体化？对城市和区域发展的专业实践以及科学文献的研究表明，分析和反思城市和区域发展的方法很少。传统的体制模式不再适用。此外，研究领域是混合的：社会学，文化和文学研究以及商业研究的问题和方法重叠。就目前存在的一些个别研究工作而言，它们有时又回到了臭名昭著的筒仓思维：它们不是为跨部门程序创造新的术语和原始思维，而是将行为者重新归类到传统的行政、政治、经济、科学或民间社会类别。这一迫切需要不仅限于城市和区域发展。然而，在“转让议定书”研究中，应将其视为这一活动领域的一个范例。各种研究和出版物都表明了对这种研究的需求：从社会学的角度来看，在一个日益多元化的社会组织的背景下，从企业管理的角度来看，作为有效利用资源和创新治理研究的一部分。 这项研究更进一步：它对定性网络分析的数据进行建模，并在城市和区域发展的跨部门项目中创建一个行为者类型学。在叙事模式中，它提出了一个问题，即演员如何在其中定位自己，以及他们如何定义自己的角色。它进行了一种范式转变：决定性的不是行为者的出身，而是他们在部门间进程中的机构和作用类型。这项研究的核心方法假设，叙述-因为它们作为愿景切中要害-是部门间项目的驱动力。数据库由城市和区域发展部门间项目的五项实地研究组成。它们属于图林根国际建筑协会（IBA）和蒙特利尔创新区（QI）。采访了政治、行政、民间社会和私营管理领域的行为者。在这项研究中，以行动者为中心的工作文化的深刻见解与网络分析，组织理论和讲故事的反思相结合。这些例子包括各种各样的措施，如内城发展、可持续农业、交通基础设施、图像建筑和新数字技术的露天实验室。在现代传播社会，新的演员进入竞技场。传统的组织模式不再有效。"转让议定书“研究提出了一项建议，使部门间项目更容易描述和分析。

Get out of silo thinking”, is a popular slogan not only, but also in urban and regional development. Administration, politics, business, science and civil society have to look for new collaborations. But how can intersectoral work be made tangible? A look at professional practice in urban and regional development as well as at scientific literature shows that methods of its analysis and reflection are rare. Usual institutional models no longer apply. Moreover, the field of research is hybrid: Questions and methods of sociology, cultural and literary studies, and business studies overlap. As far as some individual research works exist, they sometimes fall back into the notorious silo thinking: instead of creating new terms and original mind sets for intersectoral procedures, they sort actors back into the traditional clusters of administration, politics, economy, science or civil society. This desideratum is not restricted to urban and regional development. In the study “Transfer Protocols”, however, it should be considered as an example in this field of activity. The demand for this kind of research has been indicated in various studies and publications: from a sociological perspective in the context of an increasingly pluralistically organized society and from a business management perspective as part of the research on the efficient use or resources and innovative governance. This research goes one step further: it models the data of qualitative network analysis and creates a typology of actors in intersectoral projects of urban and regional development. Within narrativemodels it poses the question of how actors locate themselves in them and how they define their roles. It undertakes a paradigm shift: not the origin of the actors is decisive, but their agency and type of role in the intersectoral process. The central approach of this research assumes that narratives – as they get on the point as visions – are the drivers of intersectoral projects. The data base is made up of five field studies of intersectoral projects in urban and regional development. They belong to the Internationale Bauausstellung (IBA) Thüringen and the Quartier de l’innovation (QI) in Montréal. Actors in the fields of politics, administrations, civil society and in the private management are interviewed. Deep actor-centered insights in work cultures are combined in this research with reflection on network analysis, organizational theory and storytelling. The examples include measures as diverse as inner-city development, sustainable agriculture, traffic infrastructure, iconographic architectures and open-air laboratories for new digital technologies. New actors enter the arena in the modern communication society. Classical organizational models are no longer effective. The research „Transfer Protocols“ provides a proposal to make intersectoral projects easier to describe and to analyse.