Transfer Protocols. Storytelling and communlcation In lntersectoral processes of urban and regional development.

跳出筒仓思维”，不仅是一个流行的口号，而且在城市和区域发展中也是如此。行政、政治、商业、科学和公民社会必须寻求新的合作。但是，如何才能使跨部门工作具体化呢？从城市和区域发展的专业实践以及科学文献来看，对其进行分析和反思的方法是罕见的。通常的制度模式不再适用。此外，研究领域是混合的：社会学，文化和文学研究以及商业研究的问题和方法重叠。就目前存在的一些个人研究工作而言，它们有时会陷入臭名昭著的筒仓思维：它们没有为跨部门程序创造新的术语和原始思维模式，而是将行为者重新分类为行政、政治、经济、科学或公民社会的传统集群。这一愿望并不局限于城市和区域发展。但是，在“转让议定书”研究报告中，应将其视为这一活动领域的一个例子。各种研究和出版物都表明了对这种研究的需求：从社会学的角度来看，在一个组织日益多元化的社会背景下，从企业管理的角度来看，作为资源有效利用和创新治理研究的一部分。这项研究更进一步：它对定性网络分析的数据进行建模，并创建了城市和区域发展跨部门项目中行动者的类型学。在叙事模型中，它提出了演员如何在其中定位自己以及他们如何定义自己的角色的问题。它进行了一种范式转变：决定性的不是行动者的出身，而是他们在部门间进程中的机构和作用类型。这项研究的核心方法是假设叙述——因为它们是愿景——是部门间项目的驱动因素。该数据库由五个关于城市和区域发展部门间项目的实地研究组成。他们属于国际Bauausstellung (IBA) th<s:1> ringen和Quartier de l 'innovation (QI) in montracimal。对政治、行政、民间社会和私人管理领域的行动者进行采访。本研究将工作文化中以行为者为中心的深刻见解与对网络分析、组织理论和讲故事的反思相结合。这些例子包括各种各样的措施，如城市发展、可持续农业、交通基础设施、图像建筑和新数字技术的露天实验室。新的演员进入了现代通信社会的舞台。经典的组织模式不再有效。“转让议定书”研究提出了一项建议，使部门间项目更容易描述和分析。

Get out of silo thinking”, is a popular slogan not only, but also in urban and regional development. Administration, politics, business, science and civil society have to look for new collaborations. But how can intersectoral work be made tangible? A look at professional practice in urban and regional development as well as at scientific literature shows that methods of its analysis and reflection are rare. Usual institutional models no longer apply. Moreover, the field of research is hybrid: Questions and methods of sociology, cultural and literary studies, and business studies overlap. As far as some individual research works exist, they sometimes fall back into the notorious silo thinking: instead of creating new terms and original mind sets for intersectoral procedures, they sort actors back into the traditional clusters of administration, politics, economy, science or civil society. This desideratum is not restricted to urban and regional development. In the study “Transfer Protocols”, however, it should be considered as an example in this field of activity. The demand for this kind of research has been indicated in various studies and publications: from a sociological perspective in the context of an increasingly pluralistically organized society and from a business management perspective as part of the research on the efficient use or resources and innovative governance. This research goes one step further: it models the data of qualitative network analysis and creates a typology of actors in intersectoral projects of urban and regional development. Within narrativemodels it poses the question of how actors locate themselves in them and how they define their roles. It undertakes a paradigm shift: not the origin of the actors is decisive, but their agency and type of role in the intersectoral process. The central approach of this research assumes that narratives – as they get on the point as visions – are the drivers of intersectoral projects. The data base is made up of five field studies of intersectoral projects in urban and regional development. They belong to the Internationale Bauausstellung (IBA) Thüringen and the Quartier de l’innovation (QI) in Montréal. Actors in the fields of politics, administrations, civil society and in the private management are interviewed. Deep actor-centered insights in work cultures are combined in this research with reflection on network analysis, organizational theory and storytelling. The examples include measures as diverse as inner-city development, sustainable agriculture, traffic infrastructure, iconographic architectures and open-air laboratories for new digital technologies. New actors enter the arena in the modern communication society. Classical organizational models are no longer effective. The research „Transfer Protocols“ provides a proposal to make intersectoral projects easier to describe and to analyse.