Historical Continuity and Discontinuity in Contemporary China

当代中国的历史连续性与断续性

• 批准号: 08208102
• 负责人: NISHIMURA Shigeo
• 金额: $ 13.89万
• 依托单位: Osaka University of Foreign Studies
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1996 至 1998
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08208102/
• 关键词: party-state system; Chinese nationalism ("Chinese" ideology); modern nationalism (nation-state ideology); people, nation, citizen; social; ecological system; traditional economy and modern market economy; modernization of political culture; modern

We attempted to reveal historical continuity and discontinuity within the following realms.In political realm, Nishimura's study involved Chinese "ethnic" nationalism and modern "nationstate" nationalism. Focusing both each ideology's distinctiveness and the interactive situation between the two, he redefined historical continuity and discontinuity which interweaves these two kinds of nationalism. Murata argued Chinese nationalism in the first half of the 20th century shifted toward forming a nation state as a world standard model, which has been reinforced even in the PRC period.As for social realm, it was revealed by Furumaya that the concepts of people, citizen, and Chinese nation form a multi-layered structure, being made situational use. Ueda conducted a new perspective analysis-history of forest and environmental protection on the long-term basis. Backed by his findings, the importance of independence of society and a down-to-earth practice was argued.Within economic realm, Tetsuyama analyzed cooperative/collaborative relationship and a smallscale agricultural management in Chinese traditional agriculture, taking its relation to people's commune or agricultural production responsibility system into consideration.Finally in the realm of thought, attempts were made to reveal the nature of mutual permeation between traditional thought and modern thought. Cal argued that Cai Yuanpei 's modernization thought was one based on the "take in everything" idea. Accepting western thought on the basis of traditional one, Cai discussed, he attempted to build the Chinese society.

在政治领域，西村的研究涉及中国“族群”民族主义和现代“民族国家”民族主义。他着眼于每种意识形态的独特性和两者之间的互动状况，重新界定了交织这两种民族主义的历史连续性和间断性。村田认为，中国的民族主义在世纪上半叶开始转向形成民族国家，成为世界标准模式，这种模式在中华人民共和国时期也得到了加强。在社会领域方面，古谷揭示了人民、公民和中华民族的概念构成了一个多层次的结构，并被情境化地使用。上田进行了一个新的视角分析--森林与环境保护的历史。在此基础上，作者论证了社会独立性和脚踏实地的重要性。在经济领域，哲山分析了中国传统农业中的合作/协作关系和小农经营，并考虑了其与人民公社或农业生产责任制的关系。最后，在思想领域，试图揭示传统思想与现代思想相互渗透的本质。卡尔认为，蔡元培的现代化思想是建立在“兼收并蓄”思想基础上的现代化思想。他在继承传统思想的基础上，接受西方思想，试图建构中国社会。

项目成果

西村 成雄: "張啓雄報告へのコメント"山室伸一編『国際シンポジウム 日本・中国・朝鮮間の相互認識と誤解の表象』. 京都大学人文科学研究所共同研究資料叢刊、第1号. 59-67 (1997)

西村茂雄：《评张庆应报告》，山室新一主编，《国际研讨会：日中韩相互承认与误解的表征》京都大学人文研究所联合研究资料丛书，第1期59。 -67 (1997)

蔡建国: "民智的開発与近代化-明治日本与清末中国的西洋認識"『中国近代城市企業・社会・空間』 (論文輯)、上海社会科学出版社. (1997)

蔡建国：《人的智力发展与现代化——明治日本与晚清中国的西方认知》，《中国现代城市企业、社会与空间》（平装本），上海社会科学出版社（1997）。

鉄山 博: "清代農業における協力・共同関係-「夥」の諸形態-"大阪商業大学論集. 第112・113合併号. 361-385 (1999)

Tetsuyama, Hiroshi：“清代农业中的合作和联合关系 - 各种形式的‘伙’ -”大阪商科大学文集第 112 期和第 113 期（1999 年）。

Murata Yujiro: "Chinese Empire and Nation State : Toward Plurality of 'China'"Kumatsushu. vol.9. (1996)

村田雄二郎：《中华帝国与民族国家：走向‘中国’的多元》熊津州。

Cai Jianguo: "Urban Management in Contemporary Japan"vol. 1-9. Shanghai Yuandong Publishing, (In Chinese).

蔡建国：《当代日本的城市管理》卷。