权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study of the Criticism for Sishu Daquan (The Great Collection of Commentaries on Four Books) in the 17th century China: From the Point of View of the Socio-Intellectual History

17世纪中国《四书大全》批评研究——以社会思想史的视角

基本信息

批准号：
15021202
负责人：
MIURA Shuichi
金额：
$ 1.92万
依托单位：
Tohoku University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In my report, The Publishing Situation of Zhang Zilie's Sishu Daquan Bian (The Criticism of the Great Collection of Commentaries on Four Books), while I explained that the political situation had a strong influence on its publish, I drew out companionship among literati, government officials and bookmakers in the 17th century China, analyzing a series of documents that appeared in the both Zhongzhen and Shunzhi editions of Sishu Daquan Bian. By the way there are six texts of Shunzhi edition of Sishu Daquan Bian. In the first chapter of my second report, Two Topics on the Commentaries on Four Books in the Early Qing Period, after I compared these texts, held in Miyagi Prefectural Library, Naikakubunko, Tokyo Metropolitan Central Library, Seikadobunko, Sonkeikakubunko and Housabunko, I presumed that one in Miyagi Prefectural Library can be the most reliable. In the second chapter, I introduced two commentaries on Four Books wrote at the early Qing dynasty, named Chongdaotang's Sishu Daquan and Zhuzi Sishu Quanyi. Zhang Tingyu and Zhu Xi, the compilers of the former, insisted the significance of self-awareness though accurate learning of Zhu Xi's Commentary on Four Books. Similarly, Yi, the compiler of the later one, made much of Zhu Xi's Sishu Huowen and aimed to unify his mind with the principle. These two commentaries can be considered as the book reflecting the intelectual tendency of the Kangxi period. Moreover, I made two lists; the documents list of the Shunzhi texts of Zhang Zilie's Sishu Daquan Bian and the basic data list of the Commentaries on Four Books in the Ming-Qing era.

在我的报告中，（《四书大传批评》），我在解释政治形势对它的出版有很大影响的同时，我引出了世纪中国文人、政府官员和书商之间的友谊，对《四书大全编》中出现的一系列文献进行分析。顺治本《四书大全编》有六种文本。在第二次报告的第一章《清初四书评点二题》中，笔者对宫城县立图书馆、内阁文库、东京都立中央图书馆、清门文库、松景阁文库、厚坂文库的文本进行了比较，认为以宫城县立图书馆的文本最为可靠。第二章介绍了清初的两部《四书》评点，分别是崇道堂的《四书大全》和《朱子四书全书》。《四书》的编撰者张廷玉、朱熹通过对《四书》的准确学习，强调了自我意识的重要性。《四书霍文》的编撰者易纲也同样重视朱熹的《四书霍文》，力求将思想统一于《四书霍文》的原则。这两篇评点可以说是反映康熙朝知识分子倾向的著作。此外，还列出了张自烈《四书大全编》顺治文本的文献目录和明清时期《四书传》的基本资料目录。