权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A historical study on the developement of the mind construction of Chinese literati

中国文人心灵建设发展的历史考察

基本信息

批准号：
05451066
负责人：
MIURA Shuichi
金额：
$ 3.97万
依托单位：
Tohoku Univ.
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1993
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1993 至 1995
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05451066/
关键词：
China literati elite author mind activity politics faith religion

项目摘要

We explored how the mind construction of Chinese literati was developed historically, using a method of the philological positivism. Some of important results are as follows ;At the medieval Chinese Buddhist society, as some people who took the position that the two way of entering the truth by conviction intellectually and practice (****) were appeared, the leading faction began to attack them that they were dispising their doctrin and discipline, while the other religionist were tempting them that the man attained non-existant (*) should not need to lead an ascetic life. In general, the pre-modern Chinese literati are getting to internalize this composition of confrontation among the medieval Chinese Buddhist, that is to say this composition is making a basic mind frame of the pre-modern Chinese literati.For instance, the Northern Sung literati took a strong interst how history was locating theirself, persistently held on their struggle for self-preservation while enholding thier descendant. Moreover a many kind of controversy about the propriety of feng-jian or jun-xian (**・**) and an assertion which the six Confucian canon (**) was one with a history had been recuring. These facts prove that the mind of the pre-modern Chinese literati is inclined to recognize the value of existant (*) as fame on a history, a definite argumentum, etc. However we think it also equippes itself with a theoretical apparatus for getting over that sort of existant, the reason why the purpose for such argument is not to maintain the present condition but to reorganize it.

我们运用文献学实证主义的方法，探讨了中国文人的心性建构是如何在历史上发展的。一些重要的结果如下：在中世纪的中国佛教社会，随着一些人的立场出现，通过信念，智力和实践进入真理的两种方式(*)出现，领导派别开始攻击他们，他们是在消解他们的教义和纪律，而另一位宗教家则引诱他们，获得不存在的人(*)应该不需要过苦行生活。总体而言，前现代中国文人正在内化这种中世纪中国佛教徒之间对抗的成分，也就是说，这一成分正在构成前现代中国文学的基本思想框架。例如，北宋文人对历史如何定位自己产生了强烈的兴趣，在留住后代的同时，执着地进行着自我保护的斗争。此外，关于风简或君贤(**·**)是否得体的各种争论以及六经(**)是有历史的论断也一直在继续。这些事实证明，中国前现代文人的思想倾向于将存在(*)的价值认同为历史上的名声、一种确定的论证等，但我们认为它也为自己配备了克服这种存在的理论工具，这就是为什么这种论证的目的不是维持现状，而是重组现状。