A historical study on the developement of the mind construction of Chinese literati

中国文人心灵建设发展的历史考察

基本信息

批准号：
05451066
负责人：
MIURA Shuichi
金额：
$ 3.97万
依托单位：
Tohoku Univ.
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1993
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1993 至 1995
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05451066/
关键词：
China literati elite author mind activity politics faith religion

项目摘要

We explored how the mind construction of Chinese literati was developed historically, using a method of the philological positivism. Some of important results are as follows ;At the medieval Chinese Buddhist society, as some people who took the position that the two way of entering the truth by conviction intellectually and practice (****) were appeared, the leading faction began to attack them that they were dispising their doctrin and discipline, while the other religionist were tempting them that the man attained non-existant (*) should not need to lead an ascetic life. In general, the pre-modern Chinese literati are getting to internalize this composition of confrontation among the medieval Chinese Buddhist, that is to say this composition is making a basic mind frame of the pre-modern Chinese literati.For instance, the Northern Sung literati took a strong interst how history was locating theirself, persistently held on their struggle for self-preservation while enholding thier descendant. Moreover a many kind of controversy about the propriety of feng-jian or jun-xian (**・**) and an assertion which the six Confucian canon (**) was one with a history had been recuring. These facts prove that the mind of the pre-modern Chinese literati is inclined to recognize the value of existant (*) as fame on a history, a definite argumentum, etc. However we think it also equippes itself with a theoretical apparatus for getting over that sort of existant, the reason why the purpose for such argument is not to maintain the present condition but to reorganize it.

我们探索了中国文学的思维构建是如何使用语言学实证主义方法来发展的。一些重要的结果如下；在中世纪的中国佛教社会中，有些人认为，出现了通过信念和实践来进入真理的两种方式（****），领先的因素开始攻击他们，因为他们正在剥夺他们的教义和纪律，而其他宗教主义者则诱使他们诱使他们诱使他们不受非遗产的态度（*）终生（*），总的来说，中国前的文字正在内部化这种中世纪的中国佛教徒对抗的组成，也就是说，这种组成是成为前中国文字的基本思维框架。此外，关于冯·吉安（Qun-jian）或6月（** ・ **）的适当性的许多争议，以及六个儒家佳能（**）的主张，有一个历史的人。这些事实证明，前现代中国文学的思想倾向于认识到现有（*）在历史上的名声，定义的论证等。但是，我们认为它也等于理论上的仪器，使其与存在这种情况的理论仪器相同，而不是维持这种情况的目的，而不是维持当前的条件，而是将其重新进行。