Reconciling fragmented and contested landscapes

协调分散且有争议的景观

• 批准号: 511751806
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Tobias Plieninger
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/511751806?language=en
• 关键词: Reconciling; fragmented; contested; landscapes

RECONNECT focuses on the connections and, in particular, the disconnect of biodiversity conservation from other aspects of contemporary landscapes and societies. Fragmentation, contestation, and disconnection can be institutional, ecological, and social. This manifests in interrupted ecological flows through habitat networks, siloed sectoral planning, and plural lifestyles and values - leading to tensions between conservation, equity, and production goals, and to clashing governance priorities and landuse practices. We will collaborate with stakeholders to generate in-depth knowledge about ways to manage institutional, ecological, and social boundaries in four case sites. The sites, located in France, Germany, South Africa, and Sweden each extend across urban to rural gradients with different types of conservation governance of protected areas and surrounding landscapes. The inter- and transdisciplinary ‘reconnection’ approach will be achieved by 1) developing a coherent set of tools and processes for systematically identifying and assessing the interconnections between ecosystems, community values, and diverse institutional arrangements; and 2) developing governance models and practices for surfacing and managing tensions and for (re-)connecting people and ecosystems. Social-ecological systems- and governance researchers in Work Package (WP)1 will assess the social-ecological context to biodiversity protection and identify integrated governance options for the delivery of effective conservation measures. Conservation biologists and functional ecologists in WP2 draw on skills in biodiversity and ecosystem service modelling to quantify multiple dimensions of functional connectivity. In WP3, landscape ecologists and geographers explore values of nature and identify synergies and divisions for reconnection. In WP4, institutional analysis and knowledge co-creation experts seek to assess different arenas for collaboration and conflict management. In WP5, experts in sustainability science and transdisciplinary deliberation facilitate cross examination of cases and WP outcomes. Conservation policy and communication specialists in WP6 will support the policy translation, and communicate and disseminate results through relevant communication platforms, such as PANORAMA and the EU Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity. Together, the WPs will feed cross-sectoral governance and citizen involvement into the implementation of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. We add value by providing novel methods and cross-site comparative evidence for conservation strategies that can help combine or accommodate multiple values in parallel, in support of biodiversity conservation, well-being, and equity outcomes.

RECONNECT项目关注的是生物多样性保护与当代景观和社会其他方面的联系，特别是与之脱节的联系。分裂、争论和脱节可以是制度的、生态的和社会的。这表现在通过栖息地网络中断的生态流动、孤立的部门规划以及多元的生活方式和价值观——导致保护、公平和生产目标之间的紧张关系，以及治理重点和土地利用实践之间的冲突。我们将与利益相关者合作，深入了解如何在四个案例地点管理制度、生态和社会边界。这些地点分别位于法国、德国、南非和瑞典，每个地点都从城市延伸到农村，对保护区和周围景观进行了不同类型的保护治理。跨学科和跨学科的“重新连接”方法将通过以下方式实现：1)开发一套连贯的工具和过程，以系统地识别和评估生态系统、社区价值和各种制度安排之间的相互联系；2)开发治理模型和实践，以暴露和管理紧张局势，并（重新）连接人与生态系统。工作包（WP）1的社会生态系统和治理研究人员将评估生物多样性保护的社会生态背景，并确定提供有效保护措施的综合治理方案。WP2的保护生物学家和功能生态学家利用生物多样性和生态系统服务建模方面的技能来量化功能连通性的多个维度。在WP3中，景观生态学家和地理学家探索自然的价值，并确定重新连接的协同作用和划分。在WP4中，制度分析和知识共同创造专家试图评估协作和冲突管理的不同领域。在WP5中，可持续发展科学专家和跨学科审议促进了案例和WP结果的交叉审查。WP6的保护政策和传播专家将支持政策翻译，并通过相关的传播平台（如PANORAMA和欧盟生物多样性知识中心）进行交流和传播结果。《行动纲领》将共同推动跨部门治理和公民参与，推动2020年后全球生物多样性框架的实施。我们通过为保护策略提供新颖的方法和跨站点的比较证据来增加价值，这些策略可以帮助结合或容纳并行的多种价值，以支持生物多样性保护、福祉和公平结果。