The Relationship between Tradition and Scripture in the Work of Wolfhart Pannenberg and Walter Kasper

沃尔夫哈特·潘能伯格和沃尔特·卡斯帕著作中传统与圣经的关系

• 批准号: 513054792
• 负责人: Elisabeth Maikranz
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Ökumenisches Institut
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2021-12-31 至 2022-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/513054792?language=en
• 关键词: Relationship; between; Tradition; Scripture; Work

Based on the theology of the Lutheran Theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg and the Roman Catholic theologian Walter Kasper, the study details how both theological approaches grapple from within their own denominational contexts for a renewal of the understanding of Scripture and tradition, in the end arriving at a convergence in their understanding. With recourse to Scripture or tradition, both emphasize the actualization of the inherited tradition into the present, which, at the same time, contains a moment of discontinuity. Thus, tradition is not traditionalism. Based on the two approaches, an understanding of tradition is sketched with reference to the context of the emergence of tradition while also considering the new, contemporary actualization of tradition. The study fills a research gap, since so far there is no comparative study on Pannenberg and Kasper. Focused studies on Pannenberg or Kasper have only had an eclectic focus on the understanding of Scripture or tradition, without elaborating the entire context of revelation, Scripture, tradition, and hermeneutics with reference to further theological and philosophical foundations. Through the two theologians, the study can show that the Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogue has come to an effective convergence regarding the relationship of Scripture and tradition. As a comparative study from a Protestant perspective within an ecumenical horizon, it not only highlights how Pannenberg and Kasper describe the relationship between Scripture and tradition, but also focuses on how both implement the associated hermeneutical program in their theological argumentation. In this process, it becomes apparent that the confessional and intellectual traditions govern their framework despite such approximation found in their descriptions of the relationship. In other research projects, such correlation between the description of the relationship and the theological argumentation has not yet been made, indicating the originality of this study. Based on the comprehensive elaboration of the relationship between Scripture and tradition, the study aims to profile a concept of "tradition," which has been neglected in Protestant theology. In so doing, the reference to the bible, as founded by the Protestant "sola scriptura," is not abandoned. The various dynamics and aspects of the process of Christian tradition are considered. Both theologians understand tradition as a dynamic, pneumatological process where divine truth reveals itself anew. lt is not so much a matter of preserving transmitted traditions; rather it is about reappropriating them and thereby transforming the present through tradition. Tradition thus means a process of transmission that is always also a process of cognition, since the historical processes of transmission themselves have an epistemological function for the development of the revelation of God in history. Therefore, tradition - as Scripture - must be reflected upon in fundamental theology.

基于路德教会神学家沃尔夫哈特·潘嫩伯格（Wolfhart Pannenberg）和罗马天主教神学家沃尔特·卡斯珀（Walter Kasper）的神学，该研究详细介绍了两种神学方法如何从他们自己的教派背景下努力奋斗，以恢复对经文和传统的理解，最终对他们的理解产生了融合。在诉诸圣经或传统的过程中，两者都强调了将继承的传统实现到现在，同时又包含了不连续的时刻。因此，传统不是传统主义。基于两种方法，对传统的理解是根据传统出现的背景来概述的，同时也考虑了当代新的传统实现。这项研究填补了研究空白，因为到目前为止，还没有关于Pannenberg和Kasper的比较研究。对Pannenberg或Kasper的重点研究仅折衷于对圣经或传统的理解，而无需详细说明启示，圣经，传统和诠释学的整个背景，以参考进一步的神学和哲学基础。通过这两位神学家，该研究可以表明，路德教会罗马天主教的对话已经就圣经与传统的关系有效地融合。作为一项比较研究，从新教徒的角度来看，它不仅突出了潘妮伯格和卡斯珀如何描述圣经与传统之间的关系，而且还集中于两者在其神学论点中如何实施相关的诠释学计划。在此过程中，很明显，尽管在他们对关系的描述中发现了如此近似，但悔和智力传统控制了他们的框架。在其他研究项目中，尚未提出对关系的描述与神学论证之间的相关性，表明本研究的独创性。基于对圣经与传统之间关系的全面阐述，该研究旨在介绍一个“传统”的概念，该概念在新教神学中被忽略了。这样一来，新教徒“索拉·圣经”（Sola Scriptura）建立的对圣经的提及并没有被放弃。考虑了基督教传统过程的各种动态和各个方面。两位神学家都将传统理解为一个动态的气动过程，神圣的真理可以重新表现出来。这并不是保存传统传统的问题。相反，它是为了重新批准它们，从而通过传统改变了现在。因此，传统意味着传播过程也始终是认知过程，因为传播的历史过程本身具有认识论功能，可以在历史上的启示中发展。因此，必须在基本神学中反映传统 - 作为圣经。