Operative and Cooperative Mediality. The Planning History of the University Architecture in Regensburg 1962-78

运营和合作媒体。

• 批准号: 516984258
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Julian Jachmann
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Kunstgeschichte
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/516984258?language=en
• 关键词: Operative; Cooperative; Mediality.; Planning; History

From the perspective of architectural history, the German university foundations of the 1960s and 1970s can be characterised by a paradox: Their enormous building volume originated without a client, without an architect - and ultimately without a building task. More precisely, the respective institution as well as the building offices and teams of architects only emerged during the planning and building processes themselves. And the definition of a university is the subject of ongoing controversy. The opportunity to examine the history of a design operation that is embedded as well in complex and protracted processes und negotiations between heterogeneous groups of people as in architectural and political discourse, does not often arise. However, such a case exists regarding the first and decisive planning and construction phase of the University of Regensburg 1962-78. Thousands of photographs and documents as well as hundreds of models (documented in photographs) and conceptual drawings have been preserved, especially in the archive of the ‘Staatliches Bauamt Regensburg’. Thus, it is possible to investigate in detail the design process of the architecture of new brutalism and the idea of building systems. More precisely we have to ask, how concepts and forms were developed and communicated, and what roles played the countless protagonists and institutions involved, from architects to university committees and from ministries to the press and research institutions. An international exchange of ideas is documented through correspondence and study trips. The context of the project should be traced in the political and social environment, which was characterised by great dynamism in the years between the Sputnik shock, the ‘Bildungskatastrophe’ and student activism. Regarding the media of architecture, the methodological apparatus has been expanded in recent decades, important categories are operative imagery und operative mediality, the topics range from the significance of images, models and visualisations as tools for design processes to communication, from epistemic procedures to the status of the medium as an actor. New approaches emerge to understand the diverse and hybrid architectural representations that evolved in Regensburg between sketch and concept, diagram and plan, model, photograph and schema. It is necessary to ask about the role that each representation played in design, decision-making and communication: How was it possible to open up possibilities for successive designs without endangering crucial ideas such as the centre or the connection to the historical town centre? How were continuity and coherence guaranteed over a long period of time and including heterogeneous interests? How do design artefacts become operative and finally cooperative media in the fields of architecture, media and politics?

从建筑史的角度来看，20世纪60年代和70年代的德国大学基金会可以用一个悖论来描述：他们巨大的建筑体积起源于没有客户，没有建筑师-最终没有建筑任务。更确切地说，相应的机构以及建筑办公室和建筑师团队只是在规划和建筑过程中才出现的。大学的定义是一个持续争议的主题。研究设计操作的历史的机会，以及嵌入在复杂和旷日持久的过程和谈判之间的异质群体的人在建筑和政治话语，并不经常出现。然而，这样的情况存在关于里根斯堡大学1962-78年的第一个和决定性的规划和建设阶段。数以千计的照片和文件以及数百个模型（记录在照片中）和概念图纸被保存下来，特别是在“Staatliches Bauamt Regensburg”的档案中。因此，有可能详细研究新野兽主义建筑的设计过程和建筑系统的想法。更确切地说，我们必须问，概念和形式是如何发展和传播的，以及从建筑师到大学委员会，从政府部门到新闻界和研究机构，参与的无数主角和机构发挥了什么作用。通过通信和学习旅行记录了国际思想交流。该项目的背景应该追溯到政治和社会环境，其特点是在斯普特尼克冲击，“Bildungskatastrophe”和学生活动之间的几年中具有巨大的活力。关于建筑的媒介，近几十年来，方法论的装置已经扩大，重要的类别是操作图像和操作媒介性，主题范围从图像，模型和可视化作为设计过程的工具的重要性到沟通，从认知程序到媒介作为演员的地位。新的方法出现，以了解多样性和混合的建筑表现，在里根斯堡之间的草图和概念，图表和计划，模型，照片和模式演变。有必要问一下每个代表在设计、决策和交流中所扮演的角色：如何在不危及中心或与历史城镇中心的联系等关键概念的情况下为连续的设计开辟可能性？如何保证长期的连续性和一致性，包括不同的利益？设计人工制品如何成为建筑、媒体和政治领域的有效媒介并最终成为合作媒介？