The Analytical Study of the Reception of Central Governmental Educational Policy at the Local Governmental Level

地方政府对中央教育政策的接受情况分析研究

• 批准号: 01510150
• 负责人: SHIRAISHI Yutaka
• 金额: $ 1.28万
• 依托单位: Kyoto University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1989
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1989 至 1990
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-01510150/
• 关键词: Discretionary Powers; Local Government; Central Governmental Educational Policy; Superintendents; Members of Assembly; Doards of Education; Political Factors; 政策特性; 住民; 文教担当議員; 地方自治; 文部省; 初任者研修制度; 単位制高等学校; 生涯学習

In order to prove our assumption that there must be substantial discretionary powers of local government over the reception and the implementation of central governmental educational policy, contrary to the commonly believed assumption of the overall control of the central government, specifically the ministry of education, we conducted a survey, the main part of it were questionnaires to superintendents of the board of education and members of the assembly at the prefectural level, and designated big city of the Government Ordinance, respectively. The major findings of research are as follows. (1) The exercise of discretionary powers by local government varies considerably, depending on the extent of regulation of each central governmental policy, (2) the assembly members of a prefecture and of a designated city of the Government Ordinance play a significant role in accepting the central governmental policy and implementing it through cooperating with the supporting board of education, (3) to conclude, it is inevitable to take into account not only administrative factors but also political factors in order to clarify the dynamic process of the above-mentioned formulation.

为了证明我们的假设，地方政府必须有相当大的自由裁量权，在接收和执行中央政府的教育政策，相反，通常认为的假设，中央政府的全面控制，特别是教育部，我们进行了一项调查，调查的主要部分是分别向都道府县和政府法令指定的大城市的教育委员会负责人和议会成员进行的问卷调查。研究的主要结果如下。(1)地方政府行使自由裁量权的情况有很大的不同，这取决于中央政府各项政策的管制程度，（2）都道府县和政府法令指定市的议员在接受中央政府政策并通过与支持教育委员会合作实施政策方面发挥着重要作用，（3）总结说，为了澄清上述制定的动态过程，不可避免地不仅要考虑到行政因素，还要考虑到政治因素。

项目成果

Masao Ishimura: "A study of democracy in educational administration within local government" Annual Report of Kansai Kyoiku Gakkai. No. 15. (1991)

石村正雄：《地方政府内部教育行政民主研究》关西教育学会年度报告。

石村 雅雄: "地方教育行政研究の現状と課題" 関西教育学会紀要. 14. 208-212 (1990)

石村正夫：“地方教育行政研究的现状和问题”关西教育学会会刊14。208-212（1990）。

Masao Ishimura: "Recent Developments of Educational Administration Studies about the Local Level" Annual Report of Kansai Kyoiku Gakkai. No. 14. 208-212 (1990)

石村正男：《地方教育行政研究的最新进展》关西教育学会年度报告。

石村 雅雄: "地方教育行政における「民主性」概念についての考察" 関西教育学会紀要. 15. (1991)

石村正夫：“对地方教育管理中‘民主’概念的思考”关西教育学会公报15。（1991）

石村雅雄: "地方教育行政研究の現状と課題" 関西教育学会紀要. 14. (1990)

石村正夫：“地方教育行政研究的现状和问题”关西教育学会会刊14。（1990）