权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ECONOMIC PROPOSALS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY SCOTLAND AND IRELAND.

十八世纪苏格兰和爱尔兰经济建议的比较研究。

基本信息

批准号：
02630007
负责人：
SEKI Gentaro
金额：
$ 1.41万
依托单位：
KYUSHU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1990
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1990 至 1992
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-02630007/
关键词：
Scotland and Ireland Scotland and England Ireland and Britain Economic Proposal Industry and Idleness Union and Colony Economic Development Shaping of Economic Theory アイアランドとイングランド改良の主体形成経済環境経済学の体系的認識スコットランドアイアランド植物地と合邦経済

项目摘要

Faced with their failure of the economic development in late 1720s,a few decades after the Union of 1707 with England,Scottish economic pamphleteers found their countrymen too self-interested,dishonest and lazy to realize and make good use of the advantages of British mercantile system which the Union had allowed them to enjoy. Therefore,most of them requested the public authorities to put into strict execution the British laws and regulations in order to transform the character of their countrymen. However,though agreeing with this request,an anonymous author went to point out that it was also not dispensable for the public authorities to give the producers and merchants "the help of such other proper encouragements,as the circumstances of the business from time to time required."It is remarkable that on the basis of his distinction of the transforming persons from the transformed,he made clear the importance of policy-makers' inquiring into"the circumstances of the business",because … More this suggested his followers that their most important task would be to give the policy-makers the exact information of what"the circumstances of the business". They,in fact,did it,and in so doing they highly improved their own economic insight and theories and changed their view of human nature to identify "the circumstances of the business"precisely. On the other hand,Irish economic pamphleteers still insisted,just like some of Scottish pamphleteers had done during the period of the Union-controversy,that both Ireland and Britain would be benefited, if Irish people were allowed to join the British mercantile system thoroughly: They were thinking Irish economic development by means of their use of Britain. Thus the Irish were behind the Scottish. This resulted in the birth of Smithian economic theory in 1776 and the Scottish economic growth from late 18th century in Scotland. Therefore,we should put a higher value on the significance of the development of the Scottish economic pamphlets. Less

面对1720年代末经济发展的失败，即1707年与英国联合几十年后，苏格兰经济小册子的作者们发现他们的同胞太自私、不诚实和懒惰，以至于无法认识和利用联盟允许他们享受的英国商业体系的优势。因此，他们中的大多数人要求公共当局严格执行英国的法律法规，以改变国民的性格。然而，一位不愿透露姓名的作者虽然同意这一要求，但他指出，公共当局也不能缺少对生产商和商人“根据企业情况不时需要的其他适当鼓励的帮助”。值得注意的是，他在区分转型者和被转型者的基础上，明确了政策制定者调查“企业情况”的重要性，因为……更多他的追随者认为，他们最重要的任务是向决策者提供有关“企业情况”的准确信息。事实上，他们确实做到了，并且通过这样做，他们极大地提高了自己的经济洞察力和理论，改变了对人性的看法，从而准确地识别了“商业环境”。另一方面，爱尔兰的经济小册子仍然坚持认为，就像一些苏格兰小册子在联盟争议时期所做的那样，如果允许爱尔兰人民彻底加入英国的商业体系，爱尔兰和英国都会受益：他们认为爱尔兰的经济发展是通过利用英国来实现的。因此，爱尔兰人落后于苏格兰人。这导致了1776年斯密经济理论的诞生以及苏格兰从18世纪末开始的经济增长。因此，我们应该更加重视苏格兰经济小册子的发展意义。较少的