Reconsidering Cultured Intercouse through "Silk Road"

通过“丝绸之路”重新思考文化交流

• 批准号: 03041106
• 负责人: KARASHIMA Noboru
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: The University of Tokyo
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Survey.
• 财政年份: 1991
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1991 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-03041106/
• 关键词: Sagdian Culture; Helenistic; Indianization; OC-Eo; Indian Culture in Southeast Asia

This research project airs to re-examine the cultural exchange between western and eastern world before the 10th century AD. The research member were grouped into two fields. The first group did research in the Central Asia area in the USSR to examine the relation between the local culture and western culture in the pre and early historical period through the investigations of some archaeological remains and objects. The second group did research in some archaeological sites in Southern Vietnam and Southern Laos to discuss the historical process of early Indianization in Southeast Asia with corporation of Indian, Vietnamese and Lao scholaras. This was the first opportunity for Indian Archaeologists to do research in Vietnam and Laos.The first Group did research many archaeological sites and museums to examine Sogdian cultural vestiges. they concluded that the Sogdian culture flourished on the base of the Central Asian local culture and was also influenced under the great Helenistic civ … More ilization.The Second group under the leadership of Prof. Karashima visited some archaeological remains and examined hitherto unknown inscriptions written in Sanscrit belonging to so-called 0c Eo culture.Their preliminary observations are as follows ;(1) So-called Indianized period in Southeast Asia before the 8 th century should be divided into three stages. Before the 5th century, Between the 5th and 8th century and after the 9th century.(2) Before the 5th century, Indianization in Southeast Asia was non systemized or "Indic". After the 5th century, it had flourished quite systematically and rapidly which should be concerned the political development in South Indian States.(3) The Indianization in Southeast Asia was not from a certain area and dynasty in India but from plural areas and dynasties and localized in Southeast Asia.(4) After the 6-7th century, Indian civilization in Southeast Asia developed in their local cultural base, especially in designs of Hindu Gods sculptures and Inscription languages. Less

本研究计画旨在重新检视公元世纪以前的东西方文化交流。研究人员被分成两个领域。第一组在苏联中亚地区进行了研究，通过对一些考古遗迹和实物的调查，考察了当地文化与前早期历史时期西方文化的关系。第二组考察了越南南部和老挝南部的一些考古遗址，探讨了东南亚早期印度化的历史进程，并与印度、越南和老挝的印度人进行了合作。这是印度考古学家第一次有机会在越南和老挝进行研究。第一批考古学家确实研究了许多考古遗址和博物馆，以研究粟特文化遗迹。他们认为粟特文化是在中亚地方文化的基础上发展起来的，同时也受到了海伦教大文明的影响。 ...更多信息 第二组在唐岛教授的带领下，考察了一些考古遗迹，并对迄今未知的梵文铭文进行了研究，初步认为：（1）世纪以前东南亚的所谓印度化时期应分为三个阶段。5世纪以前，5 - 8世纪之间，9世纪以后。(2)世纪以前，东南亚的印度化是非制度化的，是“印度化”的。世纪以后，它得到了较为系统和迅速的发展，这与南印度诸邦的政治发展不无关系。(3)东南亚的印度化不是从印度的某一地区、某一王朝开始的，而是从多个地区、多个王朝开始的，并在东南亚本土化。(4)6- 7世纪以后，东南亚的印度文明在其本土文化的基础上得到了发展，特别是在印度教神像的雕刻设计和铭文语言方面。少

项目成果

Noboru Karashima: "The Mekong River and Indian Culture" Yomiuri Shinbun. 2.24-2.28. 5 (1992)

辛岛升：《湄公河与印度文化》读卖新闻。

加藤 九祥: "アシュハバ-ドからアルマ・アタへの旅" 加藤九祥, 74 (1991)

加藤 Kusho Kato：“从阿沙巴德到阿拉木图的旅程” Kusho Kato，74（1991）

K. V. Ramesh: "three Weeks in the Mekong Delta." Journal of the Epigraphical Society of India. 18. 122-129 (1992)

K. V. Ramesh：“湄公河三角洲三周。”

辛島 昇: "メコンの流れとインド文化" 読売新聞1992.2.24(夕)〜2.28. 5 (1992)

辛岛登：《湄公河与印度文化的流动》读卖新闻 1992.2.24（晚） - 2.28.5（1992）

K.V.Ramesh: "Three Weeks in the Mekong Delta" Journal of the Epigraphical Society of clndia. 18. 122-129 (1992)

K.V.Ramesh：《湄公河三角洲的三周》，印度金石学会杂志。