权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Theoretic and Empirical Research on the Relationship between Criminal Policy and Social Welfare Policy for Criminals

刑事政策与罪犯社会福利政策关系的理论与实证研究

基本信息

批准号：
06620043
负责人：
DOI Masakazu
金额：
$ 1.15万
依托单位：
KYUSHU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1994
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1994 至 1996
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-06620043/
关键词：
HARMFUL EFFECTS OF CONFINEMENT HELP FOR CRIMINALS PETITION TO PAROLE REMAND DETENTION DIVERSION CRIMINAL POLICY SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY REHABILITATION SERVICES 犯罪者援助矯正と保護の相互連携社会的援助司法福祉行刑刑事政策福祉政策犯罪者処遇

项目摘要

1.on paroleI reviewed the justification of people, not from the aspect of criminal policy but from the aspect of social welfare policy. I concluded, prisoners have petitions to parole, because the state has an obligation to eliminate the harmful effects that the confinement has.2.on remand detentionIf the state has an obligation to eliminate the harmful effects, we should first consider the pre-convicted prisoner who receives the presumption of innocence and is separated from his social life. It is essential for him to be helped not only legally but also welfarefully. But until now there are no research about it in japan. I discussed the aid for pre-convicted prisoner from the viewpoint of removing the harmful effects.3.on juvenile lawThe juvenile law includes also the important issues about the relationship between criminal policy and social welfare policy. In particular on diversion I have reviewed the discussion and the proposal about juvenile police in Germany. I point out the contradiction when the criminal justice system has also functions of welfare.4.on rehabilitation servicesRehabilitation services are the most important aspects for the above relationship. "rehabilitation services act 1996" is enforced, but we have still the following problems. (1) There are no consistence between "offenders prevention and rehabilitation law" and "probationary supervision act" and no concrete provisions about cooperation with organs of welfare.(2) There are no provisions about legal status and rights of non-custodial convicts. (3) There are little comparative studies about international rules on the non-custodial sanctions in japan.

一、关于假释我不是从刑事政策的角度，而是从社会福利政策的角度来考察人的正当性。我的结论是，囚犯有假释请求，因为国家有义务消除监禁的有害影响。2.关于还押拘留如果国家有义务消除有害影响，我们应该首先考虑接受无罪推定并与社会生活分离的预定罪囚犯。对他来说，不仅在法律上而且在福利上得到帮助是至关重要的。但到目前为止，在日本还没有关于它的研究。从消除犯罪预备犯危害的角度探讨了犯罪预备犯的救助问题。3.少年法少年法中还包括刑事政策与社会福利政策的关系等重要问题。特别是在分流方面，我回顾了德国关于少年警察的讨论和建议。指出了刑事司法制度同时具有福利功能时的矛盾。4.关于康复服务康复服务是上述关系中最重要的方面。《1996年康复服务法》已经实施，但我们仍然存在以下问题。(1)我国《罪犯预防教养法》与《缓刑监督管理法》不一致，对与福利机构的配合也没有具体规定。(2)没有关于非监禁罪犯的法律的地位和权利的规定。(3)关于日本非监禁刑的国际规则比较研究较少。