权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study on the History of Nyaya System of Logic : Annoted Translation of the vakyartha section of the Nyayamanjari

Nyaya逻辑系统历史研究: Nyayamanjari vakyartha部分的注释翻译

基本信息

批准号：
09610019
负责人：
MARUI Hiroshi
金额：
$ 1.66万
依托单位：
The University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1998
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09610019/
关键词：
history of Indian philosophy Indian system of Logic (Nyaya)Nyayamanjari Jayanta Bhatta theories of knowledge (pramana)reliable words (Sabda)annoted translation text database 知識論(プラマーナ)信頼すべき言葉(シャブダ)

项目摘要

In this research project attempt has been made to analyze the pramana theories in the Nyayamanjari (=NM), a highly important text of the Indian system of logic (Nyaya), and in particular, to make an annoted Japanese translation of the vakyartha (sentence-meaning) section of NM.In this connection a close study has also been done with regard to Jayanta, the author of NM, and his works.1. About Jayanta and his works : (1) I examined precedent studies exhaustively and showed what problems remain to be solved concerning his works. In addition I prepared an English version of my relevant paper (Marui [1996]). (2) I demonstrated that the expression "another sastra" which occur several times in NM, refer not to "[Jay-anta's] another work", as was generally assumed by scholars, but to "other disciplines [than the field of nyayasatra]". (3) I drew attention to the fact that Jayanta is rarely quoted in later Nyaya literature, and added that it may suggest that he did not belong to the mainstream of the nyayasastra (4) In contrast he is quoted quite often in later Jaina philosophical texts. I have collected the fragments of Jayanta found there. Moreover I reported that there are some evidences which seem to support the assumption that the "Pallava" to which fragmentary references are made in the Syadvada-ratnakara is not identical with NM but is his another writing which is now lost.2. About NM : (1) Attention was paid to some problems of editions of NM.(2) I took a glance of the structure of the text and also to the fact that the discussion on the problem of sabda-pramana occupies considerably large portions of NM.3. About the vakyartha section of NM : (1) Analysis of the structure of this section. (2) Annoted translation (NM II, pp. 69-142).

本研究试图分析印度逻辑学的重要文本《尼耶曼扎里》（Nyayamanjari，=NM）中的pramana理论，特别是对《尼耶曼扎里》中的vakyartha部分进行了注释性的日译，并对《尼耶曼扎里》的作者贾扬塔及其作品进行了深入的研究。关于贾扬塔和他的作品：（1）我详尽地审查了前人的研究，并指出了关于他的作品还有什么问题需要解决。此外，我还准备了我的相关论文的英文版（Marui [1996]）。(2)我证明了表达“另一个sastra”发生几次在NM，指的不是“[Jay-anta的]另一个工作”，因为学者们普遍认为，但“其他学科[比nyayasatra领域]"。(3)我提醒大家注意，贾扬塔在后来的正理派文献中很少被引用，并补充说，这可能表明他不属于正理派的主流（4）相反，他在后来的耆那教哲学文献中被引用得相当频繁。我收集了在那里发现的贾扬塔的碎片。此外，我报告说，有一些证据似乎支持这样的假设，即“帕拉瓦”，其中零碎的参考是在Syadvada-ratnakara是不相同的NM，但他的另一个写作，这是现在失去了。关于《新材料》：（1）《新材料》的版本问题受到关注。(2)我看了一眼文本的结构，也注意到关于sabda-pramana问题的讨论占据了NM.3相当大的部分。关于《北蒙古语》的瓦迦塔段：（1）对该段的结构进行分析。(2)注释翻译（NM II，pp. 69-142）。