A Study on the History of Nyaya System of Logic : Annoted Translation of the vakyartha section of the Nyayamanjari

在这个研究项目中，我们试图分析印度逻辑体系（Nyaya）的一个非常重要的文本Nyayamanjari （=NM）中的pramana理论，特别是对NM的vakyartha（句子意义）部分做一个注释的日文翻译。在这方面，对《NM》的作者Jayanta和他的作品也进行了仔细的研究。关于贾扬塔和他的作品：(1)我详尽地考察了前人的研究，指出了他的作品还有哪些有待解决的问题。此外，我还准备了一份相关论文的英文版（Marui[1996]）。(2)我证明了在NM中多次出现的“另一种境界”一词，并不是像学者们普遍认为的那样，指的是“[Jay-anta]的另一部作品”，而是指“其他学科[而不是新境界]”。(3)我提请注意，Jayanta在后来的尼亚雅文学中很少被引用，并补充说，这可能表明他不属于尼亚雅派的主流。(4)相反，他在后来的耆那教哲学文本中经常被引用。我收集了在那里找到的贾扬塔的碎片。此外，我报告说，有一些证据似乎支持这样的假设，即在Syadvada-ratnakara中有片段引用的“帕拉瓦”与NM不相同，而是他现在丢失的另一种作品。关于纳米技术：(1)关注了纳米技术版本的一些问题。(2)我看了一眼文本的结构，也注意到关于sabda-pramana问题的讨论占据了NM.3相当大的部分。关于NM的vakyartha剖面：(1)该剖面的结构分析。(2)注释翻译（NM II，第69-142页）。

In this research project attempt has been made to analyze the pramana theories in the Nyayamanjari (=NM), a highly important text of the Indian system of logic (Nyaya), and in particular, to make an annoted Japanese translation of the vakyartha (sentence-meaning) section of NM.In this connection a close study has also been done with regard to Jayanta, the author of NM, and his works.1. About Jayanta and his works : (1) I examined precedent studies exhaustively and showed what problems remain to be solved concerning his works. In addition I prepared an English version of my relevant paper (Marui [1996]). (2) I demonstrated that the expression "another sastra" which occur several times in NM, refer not to "[Jay-anta's] another work", as was generally assumed by scholars, but to "other disciplines [than the field of nyayasatra]". (3) I drew attention to the fact that Jayanta is rarely quoted in later Nyaya literature, and added that it may suggest that he did not belong to the mainstream of the nyayasastra (4) In contrast he is quoted quite often in later Jaina philosophical texts. I have collected the fragments of Jayanta found there. Moreover I reported that there are some evidences which seem to support the assumption that the "Pallava" to which fragmentary references are made in the Syadvada-ratnakara is not identical with NM but is his another writing which is now lost.2. About NM : (1) Attention was paid to some problems of editions of NM.(2) I took a glance of the structure of the text and also to the fact that the discussion on the problem of sabda-pramana occupies considerably large portions of NM.3. About the vakyartha section of NM : (1) Analysis of the structure of this section. (2) Annoted translation (NM II, pp. 69-142).