A Study on the History of Nyaya System of Logic : Annoted Translation of the vakyartha section of the Nyayamanjari

本研究试图对印度逻辑体系(Nyaya)的重要文本《Nyayamanjari》中的般若理论进行分析，特别是对《Nyayamanjari》的句子意义部分进行日文翻译，并对《Nyayamanjari》的作者贾扬塔及其著作进行了细致的研究。关于贾扬塔和他的作品：(1)我详尽地查阅了先例研究，指出了关于他的作品还有哪些问题需要解决。此外，我还编写了我的相关论文的英文版本(Marui[1996])。(2)我论证了在NM中多次出现的“另一个萨斯特拉”一词，指的不是学者们普遍认为的“[Jay-anta的]另一个作品”，而是“其他学科[不同于nyayasatra领域]”。(3)我提请大家注意，加扬塔在后来的《斋月》文献中很少被引用，并补充说，这可能表明他不属于《加扬塔》的主流(4)相比之下，他在后来的《斋月》哲学文献中经常被引用。我已经收集了在那里发现的贾扬塔的碎片。此外，我报告说，有一些证据似乎支持这样的假设，即在SyAdvada-ratnakara中零星提到的“Pallava”与NM不相同，而是他的另一部作品，现已丢失。关于NM：(1)注意到NM的一些版本问题。(2)我浏览了一下正文的结构，也注意到关于萨布达-普拉马纳问题的讨论在NM中占据了相当大的比例。关于NM的瓦克亚尔塔部分：(1)这一部分的结构分析。(2)附注译文(NM II，第69-142页)。

In this research project attempt has been made to analyze the pramana theories in the Nyayamanjari (=NM), a highly important text of the Indian system of logic (Nyaya), and in particular, to make an annoted Japanese translation of the vakyartha (sentence-meaning) section of NM.In this connection a close study has also been done with regard to Jayanta, the author of NM, and his works.1. About Jayanta and his works : (1) I examined precedent studies exhaustively and showed what problems remain to be solved concerning his works. In addition I prepared an English version of my relevant paper (Marui [1996]). (2) I demonstrated that the expression "another sastra" which occur several times in NM, refer not to "[Jay-anta's] another work", as was generally assumed by scholars, but to "other disciplines [than the field of nyayasatra]". (3) I drew attention to the fact that Jayanta is rarely quoted in later Nyaya literature, and added that it may suggest that he did not belong to the mainstream of the nyayasastra (4) In contrast he is quoted quite often in later Jaina philosophical texts. I have collected the fragments of Jayanta found there. Moreover I reported that there are some evidences which seem to support the assumption that the "Pallava" to which fragmentary references are made in the Syadvada-ratnakara is not identical with NM but is his another writing which is now lost.2. About NM : (1) Attention was paid to some problems of editions of NM.(2) I took a glance of the structure of the text and also to the fact that the discussion on the problem of sabda-pramana occupies considerably large portions of NM.3. About the vakyartha section of NM : (1) Analysis of the structure of this section. (2) Annoted translation (NM II, pp. 69-142).