Basic Research on Relationship between Zhongguo Guomin Dang (GMD) and Chinese Intellectuals

中国国民党与中国知识分子关系的基础研究

• 批准号: 08610369
• 负责人: MIZUHA Nobuo
• 金额: $ 0.38万
• 依托单位: HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1996 至 1997
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08610369/
• 关键词: Chinese Modern Intellectual; Zhongguo Guomin Dang; National integration; Luo Long-ji; Zhang Nai-qi; Shi Fu-liang; Ma Xu-lun; Li Ping-xin; 国民政府; 戦時動員; 中間団体; リベラリスト; 中国民主同盟; 中国民主促進会; 中国共産党; 民主建国会; 中国近現代知識人

A purpose of my research was general understanding regarding Chinese modern intellectuals. I obtained the following results.Chinese modern intellectuals were distributed into three groups.(A) The moderates : They opposed communism and were pro-America.(B) The Independents : They oriented to reform with peaceful means, as far as possible. They tried to create diplomatic relations with both the US and the USSR.They admitted the existence of communism and were liberal.(C) The radicals. They aimed at a violent revolution with the pro-Communists.They opposed individualism with the pro-Soviet Unions.In more concrete terms, I analyzed Luo Long-ji at the time of the Nanjin Nationalist Government (1928-37). Then I made the next 2 points obvious, in comparison to members of the National Salvation Association (eadicals).1. Luo Long-ji was a liberal based on an individualism.2. The tought of Luo Long-ji sharply contrasted with "political tuttelage" policy of the CMD.I analyzed Zhang Nai-qi at the time of the Anti-Japanese War (1937-45) and obtained the next two conclusions.1. A hope of Zhang Nai-qi was to connect directly the individual with the nation. He tried to establish a strong government.2. However, Zhang Nai-qi thought that the government is necessary for a democratic reformation.I researched on Shi Fu-liang during the Civil War (1945-49). Simultaneously, I examined a criticism against Shi Fu-liang by Ma Xu-lun and Li Ping-xin. As a result, I understood the next 2 points.1. Shi Fu-liang was a liberal. He insisted that a criticism against all power is necessary for him.2. At that time, radicalism got strong in the cities. Chinese liberalism for that reason lost power.

我的研究目的之一是对中国现代知识分子的总体认识。本文的研究结果是：中国近代知识分子分为三个群体。(A)温和派：他们反对共产主义，亲美。(B)独立派：他们倾向于尽可能以和平手段进行改革。他们试图与美国和苏联建立外交关系，他们承认共产主义的存在，是自由主义者。(C)激进分子。他们的目标是与亲共产主义者一起进行暴力革命，他们与亲苏联者一起反对个人主义。更具体地说，我分析了南京国民政府时期（1928- 1937）的罗隆基。然后，我提出了接下来的两点明显的，在比较的成员，全国救国协会（eadicals）。罗隆基是以个人主义为基础的自由主义者。罗隆基的主张与国民党的“训政”政策形成鲜明对比。本文通过对抗战时期章乃器的分析，得出以下两点结论。张乃器的一个希望是将个人与国家直接联系起来。他试图建立一个强有力的政府。但章乃器认为，政府是民主改革的必要条件。与此同时，笔者还考察了马叙伦、李冰心对施复亮的批评。结果，我明白了接下来的两点。施复良是一个自由主义者。他坚持认为对一切权力的批评对他来说是必要的。当时，激进主义在城市里变得很强大。中国的自由主义因此失去了力量。

项目成果

SODA,Saburo (ed.): Leaders of Chinese Modernizaion (Chapter 5 : MIZUHA,Nobuo, "Shi Fu-liang"). TOHO-SHOTEN, 289 (1997)

苏田三郎（主编）：中国现代化的领袖（第五章：水叶伸夫，“石福良”）。

水羽 信男: "抗日戦争と中国の民主主義ー章乃器の民衆動員論を素材として" 歴史評論. 569号. 26-37 (1997)

水叶伸夫：《抗日战争与中国民主：以秋木的民众动员理论为素材》历史评论第569期。26-37（1997）。

曽田 三郎(水羽 信男): "中国近代化過程の指導者たち(第5章施復亮)" 東方書店, 289(123-154) (1997)

苏田三郎（Nobuo Mizuha）：“中国现代化进程的领导人（第五章施福良）”东宝书店，289（123-154）（1997）

IKEDA,Makoto, UEHARA,Kazuyoshi, YASUI,Sankichi (eds): History and Perspective on Chinese Modernization (Chapter 13 : MIZUHA,Nobuo, ) "Chinese Modern Intellectuals" Image from Luo Long-ji. HORITSU-BUNKA-SHA, 265 (1996)

IKEDA,Makoto, UEHARA,Kazuyoshi, YASUI,Sankichi (eds): History and Perspective on Chinese Modernization (Chapter 13 : MIZUHA,Nobuo,) 《中国现代知识分子》 图片来自罗隆基。

水羽 信男: "都市知識人と革命ー民主派知識人の建国構想" 近きに在りて. 30号. 24-33 (1996)

水羽伸夫：《都市知识分子与革命——民主知识分子的建国理念》，近第30期24-33期（1996年）。