THE FUNDAMENTAL STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENT POSSIBILITY OF JAPANESE REMEDIAL LAW

日本救济法发展可能性的基础研究

• 批准号: 08620037
• 负责人: KAWASHIMA Shiro
• 金额: $ 1.47万
• 依托单位: KYUSHU UNIVERSITY (1997-1998)Kumamoto University (1996)
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1996 至 1998
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08620037/
• 关键词: REMEDIAL LAW; CIVIL PROCEDURE; INJUNCTIONS; DAMAGES; JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT; BANKRUPTCY; SUBSTANTIVE LAW; TORTS; 違法行為; 救済規範; 民事訴訟法; 民事執行法; 不法行為法; 損害賠償請求; 民事保全

They said the traditional procedural theory in Japan was that the role of civil procedure was to idealy establish the existence or inexistence of a substantive right and that of judgment enforcement was to implement such a righ faithfully. Then it was thought as natural that a substantive right a priori included the specific remedy, which could be drawed logically.However I made a point that in order to discover, check and control the discretion in judge's creating the specifically adequate remedy in one case at fast the norm of the remedial law should be separated from the norm of the substantive right and then new remedial norm should be created from case to case so as to give the judge the guide to make the judgment including the best remedy in one case.To concrete this theory I wrote following articles in three years.I think that I continue to study on the above subject.

他们表示，日本传统的程序理论认为，民事诉讼的作用是理想地确定实体权利的存在或不存在，而判决执行的作用是忠实地执行这种权利。那么，先天的实体权利包含具体救济就被认为是理所当然的事情，可以从逻辑上得出。但我提出，为了快速发现、制约和控制法官在某一案件中创设具体充分救济的自由裁量权，救济法的规范应该与实体权利的规范分开，然后根据具体情况创设新的救济规范，以指导法官做出包括最佳救济在内的判决。 为了具体化这个理论，我在三年内写了以下文章。我认为我会继续研究上述主题。

项目成果

SHIRO KAWASHIMA: "THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS ON CREDITORS' MEETING IN BANKRUPTCY" JURISTO. vol.1111. 173-180 (1997)

川岛四郎：“破产债权人会议的基本问题”JURISTO。

川嶋四郎: "一九世紀ドイツにおけるイミッション(Immission)訴訟・執行手続の救済過程について-ライヒ最高裁判所(Reichsgericht)の判例を素材として-" 熊本法学. 89号(刊行予定). (1997)

川岛四郎：“论19世纪德国的入境诉讼和执行程序的补救过程——以帝国法院案件为基础”，熊本重学第89期（待出版）。

川嶋四郎: "通常訴訟の審理について" 法学研究. 65・3,4. 851-864 (1999)

川岛四郎：《关于普通诉讼的审判》《法理学研究》65・3,4（1999）。

SHIRO KAWASHIMA: "THE APPLICATION SUBJECT AND JUDGMENT SUBJECT IN CIVIL PROCEDURE" HOGAKU SEMINA. vol.501. 56-59 (1996)

川岛四郎：“民事诉讼中的申请主体和判决主体”HOGAKU SEMINA。

川嶋四郎: "法・裁判・人間、そして感性" 法学教室. 210. 64-65 (1998)

川岛四郎：“法律、审判、人类和敏感性”法律课堂。210. 64-65 (1998)