权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL HUB AIRPORTS

国际枢纽机场经济分析

基本信息

批准号：
08630006
负责人：
KURODA Tatsuaki
金额：
$ 1.34万
依托单位：
NAGOYA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1996
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1996 至 1998
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08630006/
关键词：
INTERNATIONAL HUB AIRPORTS ECONOMIC EXTERNALITY LANDING FEE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC GOODS 国際公費財

项目摘要

While the externality effect is larger, the utility fee becomes larger yet income-tax rate becomes smaller. This result is clearly opposite to the standard argument. If its own trip's externality effect for its own economy is greater relative to the foreigner's, the utility fee becomes larger yet income-tax rate becomes smaller. That is, if the foreign travelers are more important, income-tax rate should be higher in order to reduce airport utility fee and capture foreigner's demand. In some sense, this accords with the standard argument. If the other country's basic productivity goes up, income-tax rate decreases rapidly while the utility as well as utility fee increases a little. That is, a neighboring country's economic growth gives positive externality to the home country through hub airport competition. If the other country's population goes up, income-tax rate decreases while the utility fee increases a little. That is, a neighboring country's large population gives large revenue to the home country's budget. Thus, it can reduce the income-tax rate. If consumers prefer own country's airport more, the utility fee goes up while income-tax rate down. According to the "globalization, " people tend to ignore the "nationality" of airports recently. If it is the case, the standard argument may be justifiable.

外部性效应越大，公用事业费用越大，所得税率越小。这一结果显然与标准论点相反。如果本国旅行对本国经济的外部性效应相对于外国人更大，则公用事业费用会变大，而所得税税率会变小。也就是说，如果外国游客更重要，所得税税率应该更高，以降低机场公用事业费用，并抓住外国人的需求。在某种意义上，这符合标准论点。如果另一国的基本生产率提高，所得税税率会迅速下降，而公用事业和公用事业费用会略有增加。也就是说，邻国的经济增长通过枢纽机场竞争为母国带来正外部性。如果另一个国家的人口增加，所得税税率就会降低，而公用事业费用会略有增加。也就是说，邻国的大量人口为母国的预算提供了大量收入。因此，它可以降低所得税税率。如果消费者更喜欢本国的机场，公用事业费用会上升，而所得税税率会下降。在“全球化”的背景下，近来人们往往忽视机场的“民族性”。如果是这样的话，标准的论点可能是合理的。