Nationalism and Confucianism in Tokugawa Japan

日本德川的民族主义与儒家思想

• 批准号: 11610044
• 负责人: HIGUCHI Kozo
• 金额: $ 2.3万
• 依托单位: Aichi Prefectural University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2002
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11610044/
• 关键词: Nationalism; Confucianism; Yamasaki Ansai; The Yamasaki Ansai School; Nativism; 浅見絅斎; アンダーソン; 垂加神道; 西川如見; 武士道; 井上哲次郎; 葉隠; 和辻哲郎; 語り; 系譜学; 士道論; 死か美学; 朝鮮朱子学; 壇君; 元禄・享保

The aim of this study is to show how nationalism emerged in modern East Asia. Studies of Japanese Nationalism has been concerned as the issue only inside of Japan or as the development of nativism. However, I started my study to divide nationalism and nativism, and to proceed the study, I paid the special attention to Confucian nativism in Tokugawa Japan, and I concerned how/when Confucian nativism was reorganized as the national language.The original point of this study is to regard the Confucianism in Tokugawa Japan as something exists outside of nationalism which had been studied, and this has been done to deal with the Yamasaki Ansai School in the field of the intellectual history studies.

本研究的目的是展示民族主义是如何在现代东亚产生的。对日本民族主义的研究一直被认为是日本国内的问题，或者是本土主义的发展。然而，我的研究开始于对民族主义和本土主义的区分，在研究的过程中，我特别关注了日本德川的儒家本土主义，我关注了儒家本土主义是如何/何时被重新组织为民族语言的。本研究的出发点是将德川日本儒学视为一种存在于已被研究的民族主义之外的东西，并以此来应对思想史研究领域的山崎安西学派。

项目成果

"Bushido as a Narrative Discourse: An Attempt at a Critical Genealogy"Journal of Japanese Intellectual History. 33. (2001)

“作为叙事话语的武士道：批判谱系的尝试”日本思想史杂志。

"Nativism in Tokugawa Japan: the Yamasaki Ansai School and Nationalism"The Annual of Japanese Intellectual History. 20. (2003)

《日本德川本土主义：山崎安西学派与民族主义》《日本思想史年鉴》。

"A Criticism of National History"The Annual of Japanse Intellectual History. 17. (1999)

《国史批判》日本思想史年鉴。

樋口浩造: "「江戸」の自国意識-山崎闇斎学派とナショナリズム"日本思想史研究会会報. 20. 297-308 (2003)

樋口幸三：“‘江户’的民族意识——山崎安西学派与民族主义”日本智力史研究学会会刊20。297-308（2003）。

樋口 浩造: "語りの中の「武士道」-批判的系譜学の試み"日本思想史学. 33. 183-198 (2001)

Kozo Higuchi：“叙事中的‘武士道’——批判谱系学的尝试”《日本思想史》33。183-198（2001）。