Ways of life and Interaction in the Waters of EAST ASIA in the 17-19th centuries

有没有可能推测17-19世纪日本老百姓和Kores之间的联合行动的可能性？在过去的研究中，关节的潜力是由三个案例来解释的(-群岛，北海道-岛，乌龙岛。但基于历史文献的分析，不可能一概而论(Report，Chapterl，3，4)。有许多研究可以很容易地说出早期现代的国际理解。但在这种情况下：越南和日本之间的船只失事人员，相互理解并不容易(报告，第二章)。此外，我们还讨论了17-19世纪日本人与韩国人之间相互理解的研究：(报告，章节)。此外，我还列出了《大谷阁，村川阁》(报告，补充)的清单。

Is it possible to conjecture the potential for joint action between the common people of Japan and Kores in the 17-19th centuries? In the past studies, the potential for joint is explained by three cases Got( -Islands,Hokkaido-Island,Ullung-do Island. But an analysis based on historical documents, it is impossible to conjecture it in all cases(REPORT,Chapterl, 3, 4).There are many studies which easily say international understandings in Early Modern Age. But in the case : of Ship-wrecked people between Vietnum and Japan, it is not easy to understand each other(REPORT,Chapter2). What is more,we discuss the studies pn mutual understandings between Japansese and Korean in 17-19th centurie : (REPORT, Chapters).In addition to these, I made the List of "OYA-KE,MURAKAWA-KE DOKUMENTS"(REPORT, Suppliment).