权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study on the Genroku era Takeshima affair

元禄时代竹岛事件研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510354
负责人：
IKEUCHI Satoshi
金额：
$ 1.54万
依托单位：
NAGOYA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

About a diplomatic item between day morning around fishery right of a Takeshima(鬱陵島)peripheral sea area (the Genroku era Takeshima affair), I pushed forward reexamination of proof since the beginning to the last convergence process while laying it mainly on the analysis of "a Takeshima article" (national official document building). Therefore I scanned Tsushima affairs of a feudal clan historical materials and Tottori affairs of a feudal clan historical materials and tried for a decision of a related historical fact. I invite several degrees or a complication scene till the Genroku era Takeshima affair begins in 1693 and is settled finally in 1699. Of these, about a complication and the control process that I produced in the issue of AN-yong-bok(安龍福事件)of summer, 1696, a till now real territory problem was apt it-affiliated, it to have been evaluated and tried it to reevaluate positioning to this in what comparison of Tottori affairs of a feudal clan historical materials/Tsushima affair … More s of a feudal clan historical materials and Korea dynasty side historical materials examined. In addition, I think that a complication between the day morning that I produced in in the issue of AN-yong-bok(安龍福事件)gives off it since the time when the Tsushima feudal clan side does not communicate a document about transmission to Korea dynasty of prohibition(竹島渡海禁令)which watched Shogunate decision in January, 1696 from the first and asked you a manner that I communicate it in a mouth head. And there seems to have been differences during case Shogunate policy and Tsushima feudal clan side demands to do in case solution, and, in the background where Tsushima feudal clan asked such a manner, I think. This point conflicted with results of research report in the newly-written draft which I put. When, with results of research report, use "a Takeshima article" || made an article list to do everything and did抜粋翻刻of historical materials. And in particular I was concerned with the last convergence process of affair negotiations for the Genroku era 9-12 years and I put the manuscript of a treatise that served as historical materials explanatory notes together and carried it Less

About a diplomatic item between day morning around fishery right of a Takeshima(LING ISLAND)peripheral sea area (the Genroku era Takeshima affair), I pushed forward reexamination of proof since the beginning to the last convergence process while laying it mainly on the analysis of "a Takeshima article" (national official document building). Therefore I scanned Tsushima affairs of a feudal clan historical materials and Tottori affairs of a feudal clan historical materials and tried for a decision of a related historical fact. I invite several degrees or a complication scene till the Genroku era Takeshima affair begins in 1693 and is settled finally in 1699. Of these, about a complication and the control process that I produced in the issue of AN-yong-bok(安LONG FU THING)of summer, 1696, a till now real territory problem was apt it-affiliated, it to have been evaluated and tried to reevaluate positioning to this in what comparison of Tottori affairs of a feudal clan historical materials/Tsushima affair … More s of a feudal clan historical materials and Korea dynasty side historical materials examined. In addition, I think that a complication between the morning of the day that I produced in the issue of AN-yong-bok(安LONG FU Incident)gives off it since the time when the Tsushima feudal clan side does not communicate a document about transmission to Korea dynasty of prohibition(Bamboo Island Crossing Sea Prohibition Order)which watched Shogunate decision in January, 1696 from the first and asked you a manner that I communicate it in a mouth head. And there seems to have been differences during case Shogunate policy and Tsushima feudal clan side demands to do in case solution, and, in the background where Tsushima feudal clan asked such a manner, I think. This point conflicted with results of research report in the newly-written draft which I put. When, with results of research report, use "a Takeshima article" ||made an article list to do everything and did $> of historical materials. And in particular I was concerned with the last convergence process of affair negotiations for the Genroku era 9-12 years and I put the manuscript of a treatise that served as historical materials explanatory notes together and carried it Less