权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Post-Gender Analysis of Sexuality and Law: the Possibility of Queer Theory

性与法律的后性别分析：酷儿理论的可能性

基本信息

批准号：
11620013
负责人：
KAMIYA Masako
金额：
$ 2.11万
依托单位：
Gakushuin University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11620013/
关键词：
queer theory sexuality sexual orientation gender フェシニスト法理論フェミニスト法理論

项目摘要

In Australia, "Queer Theory" has been used to indicate, not just the existence of "discrimination" and "privacy", but also to narrate one's own story in one's own way in many legal context. This narrative methodology has bestowed the status of praxis to the theory. For example, the UN Human Rights Committee, by concluding that "sex" includes "sexual orientation" and recommended he Australian Government to abolish Tasmanian statute adjudicated as in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The recommendation made it clear that it was not enough to present one's view in traditional international law context and the obligation of sub-nation entities. In Australian legal education, much emphasis has now been given to narrative mode and story-telling in legal context.In Canada, a totally different picture emerged as Equality Clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Liberties has been used, in and out of courts, to deal with sexuality in law. Protection of de facto marriages between same-sex partners, and acceptance of same-sex marriage provincial statutes are some of the examples supporting this phenomenon. Courts also have been keen to rely upon Equality Clause rather than amorphous queer theory and the power of the narrative to accept new theory on pornography (Butler case).The comparison has indicated that new theory need not be THE only way to introduce new approach and new understanding of minorities' view-points. It might even be more productive to utilize a more familiar theory that has been transformed to include a different perspective.

在澳大利亚，“酷儿理论”不仅被用来表明“歧视”和“隐私”的存在，还被用来在许多法律语境中以自己的方式讲述自己的故事。这种叙事方法赋予了理论实践的地位。例如，联合国人权事务委员会得出结论，“性”包括“性取向”，并建议澳大利亚政府废除被裁定违反《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的塔斯马尼亚法规。该建议清楚地表明，在传统国际法和次国家实体的义务范围内提出自己的观点是不够的。在澳大利亚的法律教育中，现在非常重视在法律背景下的叙事模式和讲故事。在加拿大，由于《加拿大权利和自由宪章》的平等条款在法庭内外被用来处理法律上的性问题，出现了一种完全不同的情况。保护同性伴侣之间的事实婚姻，以及接受同性婚姻的省级法规是支持这一现象的一些例子。法院也一直热衷于依靠平等条款，而不是无定形的酷儿理论和叙事的力量来接受关于色情的新理论（巴特勒案）。比较表明，新理论不一定是引入对少数民族观点的新方法和新认识的唯一途径。利用一个更熟悉的理论，将其转化为包含不同视角的理论，可能会更有成效。