The research on the issues of the notion of damage and the measure of damages in cases of immaterial benefits had been harmed

非物质利益损害赔偿概念和损害赔偿数额问题的研究受到损害

• 批准号: 11620042
• 负责人: KUBOTA Atsumi
• 金额: $ 2.3万
• 依托单位: KOBE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11620042/
• 关键词: damages; immaterial benefits; self determination right; pure economic loss; non-pecuniary loss; 純粋経済損害; 慰謝料; 精神的損害; 金融取引

We conducted joint research on the issues of the notion of damage and the measure of damages in cases of immaterial benefits had been harmed.Topics that participants chose are as follows ;(1) The notion of damage (Prof.Mizuno).(2) Compensation for shorten the life-prolonging benefit (Prof.Otsuka).(3) Compensation for breach of patients' self determination right (Prof.Tejima).(4) Compensation for pure economic loss (Prof.Yamada)(5) Contents and functions of the right of recovering non-pecuniary loss (Prof.Kubota)Every participant made reports at the meetings on the topics with analyzing courts cases, scholarly opinions, and comparative law perspectives. Discussions were made mainly over the reporter's analysis and interpretation proposals. Following are very short descriptions of the research outcomes.Professor Mizuno, from his analysis of court cases, criticized traditional frameworks that the notion of damage should be linked with the moment of occurrence because there was scarce comp … More elling reason to think so. He proposed an alternative idea that disadvantage condition of the process in specific categories measured normatively and monetary should be the notion of damage. We could not reach a unified conclusion, but we at least agreed that h is proposal is persuasive because it showed the notion of damage that is not involved in traditional damage notion of the damages for the injury itself or of the damages for the difference of prices.Professor Otsuka analyzed recent two medical malpractice cases of the Supreme Court.He, not only compared these cases reasons with recent theoretical frameworks such as the theory of life-prolonging benefit, partial or relative causation theory, the theory of probable belief, or French idea of loss of chance doctrine, but also considered the relationship and limits among these theories. He also added the differences of conclusion of the theories.Professor Tejima analyzed medical malpractice cases that approved recovery of the breach of patients' right of self determination to his/her medical care. He considered from judgment reasons how courts measure damages of breach of informed consent, and pointed out important factors that seem to influence the measurement of damages in these sorts of cases.Professor Yamada contended that compensation for pure economic loss had not been involved in the legal order of right structure. He proposed from his conclusion of analyzing cases that the state of general property in itself should be seen as the benefit to be estimated as the standard level of property.Professor Kubota analyzed contents and function of the right of recovering non-pecuniary loss. He analyzed development of court cases on non-pecuniary loss in the German Supreme Court, and pointed out that the problem of expansion of function of non-pecuniary loss is not specific in emotional loss but the problem of the role of compensation law in general. Less

在非物质利益受到损害的情况下，我们就损害的概念和损害的衡量问题进行了联合研究。参与者选择的主题如下：(1)损害的概念（美津浓教授）。(2)缩短延长寿命利益的补偿（大冢教授）。(3)侵犯患者自主权利的赔偿（tejima教授）。(4)纯经济损失赔偿（山田教授）(5)非金钱损失追偿权的内容与功能（久保田教授）每位与会者都在会上就该议题进行了报告，分析了法庭案例、学术观点和比较法的观点。讨论主要围绕记者的分析和解读建议展开。以下是对研究成果的简短描述。Mizuno教授通过对法庭案例的分析，批评了传统的框架，即损害的概念应该与发生的时刻联系起来，因为缺乏补偿。他提出了另一种意见，即以规范和货币衡量的具体类别的进程的不利条件应该是损害的概念。我们不能得出一个统一的结论，但我们至少同意他的建议是有说服力的，因为它展示了损害的概念，而不是传统损害概念所涉及的损害本身的损害或价格差异的损害。大冢教授分析了最近大法院审理的两起医疗事故案件。他不仅将这些案例的原因与近期的理论框架如延年益寿理论、部分或相对因果关系理论、或然信念理论、法国的机会损失理论等进行了比较，而且考虑了这些理论之间的关系和局限性。他还补充了理论结论的差异。Tejima教授分析了批准恢复被侵犯的患者对其医疗服务的自决权的医疗事故案例。他从判决理由出发考虑了法院如何衡量违反知情同意的损害赔偿，并指出了在这类案件中影响损害赔偿衡量的重要因素。山田教授认为，对纯粹经济损失的赔偿并未涉及权利结构的法律秩序。他从案例分析的结论中提出，一般财产的状态本身应被视为财产的利益被估计为财产的标准水平。久保田教授分析了非金钱损失追偿权的内容和功能。他分析了德国最高法院非金钱损失案件的发展，指出非金钱损失的功能扩展问题并不是特定于情感损失的问题，而是赔偿法在一般情况下的作用问题。少

项目成果

水野謙: "損害論のあり方に関する覚書-近時の最高裁判決を手掛かりに"ジュリスト. 1199号(掲載予定). (2001)

Ken Mizuno：“关于损害赔偿理论的备忘录 - 基于最高法院最近的判决”法学家第 1199 号（即将出版）。

手嶋豊: "医療における同意の前提としての説明義務に違反したために認められた慰謝料の算定に関する考察"ジュリスト. 1199号. 18-24 (2001)

Yutaka Teshima：“关于违反作为同意医疗的解释义务的赔偿计算的考虑”，法学家，第 1199. 18-24 号（2001 年）。

手嶋豊: "医療における同意の前提としての説明義務に違反したために認められた慰謝料の算定に関する考察"ジュリスト. 1199号(掲載予定). (2001)

Yutaka Teshima：“关于违反医疗同意先决条件的解释义务的赔偿计算”法学家第 1199 号（待出版）。

窪田充見: "ドイツ法における慰謝料請求権の機能の変遷-BGHのカロリーヌ・モナコ王女事件判決をめぐる状況"ジュリスト. 1199号. 33-41 (2001)

Mitsumi Kubota：“德国法律下索赔权功能的变化 - BGH 摩纳哥卡罗琳公主案判决的情况”，法学家，第 1199 号，33-41 (2001)。

水野謙: "損害論のあり方に関する覚書-近時の最高裁判決を手掛かりに"ジュリスト. 1199号. 2-8 (2001)

Ken Mizuno：“关于损害赔偿理论的备忘录 - 基于最高法院最近的判决”法学家第 1199. 2-8 号。