The Origin and Development of Alternative of Economic Policy in the German Capitalism after World War II

二战后德国资本主义经济政策选择的起源与发展

• 批准号: 11630077
• 负责人: AMEMIYA Akihiko
• 金额: $ 1.66万
• 依托单位: Chiba University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2001
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11630077/
• 关键词: Cassel-Controversy; Productive Inflation; Liberal Interventionism; Economic Policy of As If; Artificial Equilibrium; Imperfect Competition; Competition of Industrial Location; Positive and Negative Integration; 新自由主義; 第三の道; 獲物としての国家; 多元主義; 供給指

At the last state of this research program I want to summarize my research results as following1) I took up the controversy over the economic policy in the 1920's in Germany, which was called "Cassel-controversy" at that time. Gustav Cassel asserted that the economic stagnation in Europe of those days was caused by it, that the investment was restricted by the reinforcement of trade unions and the development of the welfare state. A social democrat, Emil Lederer opposed him and argued that it was necessary to take measures to boost the economy and industry policy in order to change the old industrial structure.2) The innovation of the economic liberalism began in the 1930's. In this process the great depression and Fascism played a great role. The economic liberals maintained that "liberal interventionism" should be introduced in order to destroy the political pluralism and to bring the equilibrium to imperfect competition markets. I could make clear this relationship between the economic liberals and "strong state" as Nazi Germany through the investigation of the works of the leaders of the new economic liberalism of those days, those of E.v. Beckerath, H. Stackelberg, L.Miksch, W.Eucken and A.Rustow.3) I paid attention to the political meanings of the perspective of social historical integration in the context of globalization and stressed the importance of a viewpoint of the positive and negative integration. From this viewpoint I examined closely the policy concept of Oskar Lafontaine, who criticized the new liberalism furiously and proposed as the important political tasks in the age of globalization the international cooperation for stabilization of currency and regulation of movement of short-term capital.

在本研究计划的最后，我想总结我的研究成果如下：1)我参与了1920年代德国S经济政策的争论，当时被称为卡塞尔争议。古斯塔夫·卡塞尔断言，当时欧洲的经济停滞是由它造成的，投资受到工会加强和福利国家发展的限制。社会民主党人埃米尔·莱德勒反对他，认为有必要采取措施提振经济和产业政策，以改变旧的产业结构。2)经济自由主义的创新始于20世纪30年代的S，在这个过程中，大萧条和法西斯主义发挥了巨大的作用。经济自由主义者主张引入“自由干涉主义”，以破坏政治多元化，为不完全竞争市场带来均衡。我可以通过对当时新经济自由主义领导人，即E.V.领导人的著作的调查，弄清楚经济自由主义者和作为纳粹德国的“强大国家”之间的这种关系。贝克拉斯、斯塔克尔伯格、米克施、欧肯和拉斯托。3)我关注了全球化背景下社会历史整合观的政治意义，强调了正负整合观的重要性。从这个角度考察了奥斯卡·拉方丹的政策理念，他对新自由主义进行了猛烈的批判，并将稳定货币和规范短期资本流动的国际合作作为全球化时代的重要政治任务。

项目成果

雨宮 昭彦: "帝政期ドイツの新中間層"東京大学出版会. 291 (2000)

雨宫明彦：《德意志帝国的新中产阶级》东京大学出版社 291 (2000)。

雨宮昭彦: "馬場哲他編『西洋経済史学』第8章「大不況と帝国主義のヨーロッパ」を執筆"東京大学出版会. 416(247-270) (2001)

雨宫明彦：“东京大学出版社编辑的《西方经济史》第 8 章‘大衰退和帝国主义欧洲’”。

雨宮 昭彦: "1930年代ドイツにおける「リベラルな国家干渉」論の展開(1)"千葉大学経済研究. 16巻3号. 757-781 (2001)

雨宫明彦：“20 世纪 30 年代德国‘自由国家干预’理论的发展（1）”，千叶大学经济研究，第 16 卷，第 3 期，757-781（2001 年）。

雨宮昭彦: "帝政期ドイツの新中間層-資本主義と階層形成-"東京大学出版会. 291 (2000)

雨宫明彦：“德意志帝国的新中产阶级——资本主义与阶级形成”，东京大学出版社291（2000）。

雨宮昭彦: "社会史的収斂と通貨的収斂のディレンマ"The Bulletin of Yokohama City University. vol.52.2. 137-148 (2001)

雨宫明彦：“社会历史趋同与货币趋同的困境”横滨市立大学通报第 52.2 卷（2001 年）。