权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Study of International Civil Procedure and Harmonization of Civil Procedure Law

国际民事诉讼比较研究与民事诉讼法协调

基本信息

批准号：
12620047
负责人：
KAISE Yukio
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
Tohoku University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12620047/
关键词：
Comparative law in the United States Reception of foreign law Harmonization of civil procedural law Comparative Civil Procedure European code of civil procedure Private international law in insolvency cases International insolvency law EU re

项目摘要

1. In this research project, new directions of American comparative law are examined as a basic study for reception and transplant of foreign law, focusing at achievements of Mr. Mattias Reimaun, one of the leading comparative law scholars in the U.S.2. To establish the theoretical foundation for harmonizing (procedural) law, following issues are analyzed: historical development of comparative civil procedure, legal transplants of procedural law, present situation of international project on comparative civil procedure, new idea of European code of civil procedure and comparative study of civil justice system. The study of comparative civil procedure contributes to create international rational legal practice, transplant efficient and fair judicial system, accelerate international harmonization of civil procedural law and provide general theory or philosophy for the reform of civil justice.3. From a viewpoint of harmonizing procedural law and in comparison with German and EU law, choice-of law problems in international insolvency law and realize international harmonization of judgment, the ler fori concursus should be applied as a rule. The applications of the law with the most significant relationship are required in exceptional cases. Because Japanese law for recognition and assistance of foreign insolvency proceedings contains no choice-of-suggestive as a guideline for future developments of Japanese law. This regulation is translated into Japanese and compared with Japanese insolvency law.

1.在本研究项目中，美国比较法的新方向被视为外国法接受和移植的基础研究，重点是美国领先的比较法学者之一Mattias Reimaun先生的成就。通过对比较民事诉讼法的历史发展、诉讼法的法律的移植、国际比较民事诉讼法项目的现状、欧洲民事诉讼法典的新理念、民事司法制度的比较研究等问题的分析，为诉讼法的协调奠定理论基础。比较民事诉讼法的研究有助于创造国际上合理的法律的实践，移植高效、公正的司法制度，促进民事诉讼法的国际协调，为民事司法的改革提供一般性的理论或哲学依据.从协调程序法的角度出发，通过与德国和欧盟法的比较，解决国际破产法中的法律选择问题，实现判决的国际协调，法院地主义应作为一项规则加以适用。在特殊情况下，需要适用与最重要关系有关的法律。因为日本关于承认和协助外国破产程序的法律中没有任何建议性的选择作为日本法律今后发展的指导方针。该条例被翻译成日文，并与日本破产法进行了比较。