A Comparative Study on Arms and Armor in East Asia -Mainly on Outfits for Cavalrymen -

东亚地区武器与铠甲的比较研究-以骑兵服装为主-

• 批准号: 13610480
• 负责人: KOBAYASHI Ken'ichi
• 金额: $ 1.41万
• 依托单位: Independent Administrative Institution National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Nara
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2001 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13610480/
• 关键词: outfits of heavy cavalrymen; armor of horse; helmet of horse; outfits of cavalrymen; scale armor; wooden armor; 高句麗; 古墳壁画; 防禦施設; 倭系甲冑; 在地系甲冑; 漆皮甲; 板綴甲; 刳抜甲

Arms and armor in Kofun period changed interacting each other. By comparing them with those excavated in Korea and China, it can be concluded that the arms and armor which appeared in the second quarter of the fifth century in Japan were fundamentally outfits for cavalrymen, and they were introduced not as separate materials, but as outfits. Particularly as for outfits of heavy cavalrymen, which were worn not only by men but also by horses, the fourth century outfits were excavated in China, and by way of Koguryo, they appeared in the southern tip of Korea Peninsula in the beginning of the fifth country, and in Japan at the end of the fifth century, appearing at different time in each century. But in Japan, outfits of heavy cavalrymen were scarcely prevalent, which seems to show that the advantage and the necessity of the fight using them couldn't be recognized. The reason for this might be that there were differences in the places and structures of defensive facilities and in the way … More of fighting between Japan and the other countries.The armor in Korea can be roughly divided into three - Korean style, Chinese northern style, and Japanese style. Among these three, Chinese northern style armor, which were outfits of heavy cavalrymen, prevailed universally in Korea. While Korean style armor were excavated from Silla region to the eastern and southern parts of Gaya region in the fourth and the fifth century, Japanese style armor were excavated mainly in the southern and western parts of Gaya region in the fifth century and were also found in Paekche region. In Japan, scale armor, that is Chinese northern style armor, were discovered, but Korean style armor weren't. These phenomena seem to reflect a part of the relationships among Silla, Paekche, and Gaya in those days and their exchanges with Japan.Concerning iron cuirasses in Kofun period, the number of excavated cuirasses which were made of organic materials has increased recently. The study of them leads to the conclusion that their appearance has some relation to Itatoji-type armor in Yayoi period which seem to have something to do with lacquered leather armor excavated from tombs of Warring States period in the middle Changjiang area in China.It is also concluded that the appearance of the cuirasses with frames in the last quarter of the fourth century has relation to kurinuki-type armor excavated in Yayoi and Kofun periods. Less

古坟时期的武器和盔甲相互影响，相互变化。通过与朝鲜和中国出土的武器和盔甲进行比较，可以得出结论，世纪后25年出现在日本的武器和盔甲基本上是骑兵的服装，它们不是作为单独的材料，而是作为服装引入的。特别是重骑兵的服装，不仅是人穿的，马也穿的，世纪的服装是在中国出土的，通过高句丽，第五世纪初出现在朝鲜半岛南端，第五世纪末出现在日本，出现在每个世纪的不同时间。但在日本，重骑兵的装备几乎不流行，这似乎表明，使用它们进行战斗的优势和必要性没有得到承认。其原因可能是防御设施的位置和结构以及防御方式的差异 ...更多信息 日本与其他国家之间的战斗。朝鲜的盔甲大致可分为三种-朝鲜风格，中国北方风格和日本风格。其中，中国北方风格的盔甲，这是重骑兵的服装，在朝鲜普遍流行。韩国式盔甲在世纪从新罗地区到加雅地区的东部和南部被挖掘出来，而日本式盔甲在世纪主要在加雅地区的南部和西部被挖掘出来，在百济地区也被发现。在日本，发现了中国北方风格的鳞甲，但没有发现朝鲜风格的盔甲。这些现象似乎反映了当时新罗、百济、伽耶之间的关系以及与日本的交流。关于古坟时代的铁胸甲，最近出土的有机材料制成的胸甲数量有所增加。通过对它们的研究，认为它们的出现与弥生时代的板藤式盔甲有关，而板藤式盔甲似乎与中国长江中游战国墓葬中出土的漆皮甲有关，并认为4世纪后25年出现的带框胸甲与熊式盔甲有关。弥生和古坟时期出土的铠甲。少

项目成果

小林謙一: "古墳時代甲冑の系譜と木甲"文化財論叢III(奈良文化財研究所学報 第65冊). 77-84 (2002)

小林健一：《古坟时代甲胄与木甲的谱系》文化遗产系列三（奈良文化财研究所公报第65卷（2002年））。