权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Implementing process of international norms in the system of international criminal justice: A comparative analysis of various types of tribunals

国际刑事司法体系中国际规范的实施过程：各类法庭的比较分析

基本信息

批准号：
13620038
负责人：
FURUYA shuichi
金额：
$ 1.02万
依托单位：
Kagawa University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13620038/
关键词：
international criminal justice war crimes implementing process Yugoslavia Rwanda Sierra Leone East Timor 管轄権

项目摘要

This research analyzed the implementing process of international norms by examining in detail the drafting process of various international criminal tribunals like ICTY, ICTR and ICC and the decisions and judgment thereof.In 2001, close examinations into the establishing process of the ICTY, ICTR and ICC have revealed that a new direct way of implementation of international norms is emerging and it has a completely different character from the traditional one which has been basically relied on the domestic legal systems of States. The research has also demonstrated that the above-mentioned special character of implementing process introduces two roles of implementing legislation of a State: Firstly a role to give effect to international norms in its domestic legal system, and secondly a role to accommodate its domestic law with international norms in order not to be in conflict with each other.In 2002, by examining the Special Court of Sierra Leone, Special Court of East Timor and ICTY/ICTR, leading principles for determining the distribution of cases between international courts and national courts were clarified. In spite of their international nature in common, each court has its own historical, political and social background. The research has demonstrated that according to the expected roles of each court vis-a-vis the States concerned, it adopts different principles for determining whether a case should be dealt with by itself or by a national court. The research also has clarified that the determination of distribution has actually been made at several levels of the whole process from investigation to trial, to which researches so far made have failed to pay attention.

本研究通过详细审查前南问题国际法庭、卢旺达问题国际法庭和国际刑事法院等国际刑事法庭的起草过程及其裁决和判决，分析了国际规范的实施过程。2001年，仔细考察前南问题国际法庭、卢旺达问题国际法庭和国际刑事法院的建立过程，发现一种新的直接实施国际规范的方式正在出现，它具有与基本上依赖于国家国内法律制度的传统方式完全不同的性质。研究还表明，执行过程的上述特殊性质使一国在执行立法方面发挥了两种作用：第一，在其国内法律体系中执行国际准则；第二，使其国内法与国际准则相适应，以避免相互冲突。2002年，通过对塞拉利昂特别法庭、东帝汶特别法庭和前南问题国际法庭/卢旺达问题国际法庭的审查，阐明了确定国际法院和国家法院之间案件分配的主要原则。尽管它们具有共同的国际性质，但每个法院都有自己的历史、政治和社会背景。研究表明，根据每个法院对有关国家的预期作用，它采用了不同的原则来确定案件应由自己处理还是由国家法院处理。研究还澄清，分配的确定实际上是在从侦查到审判的整个过程的几个层面上做出的，目前已有的研究没有注意到这一点。