Studies on the Applied Theory of Ends and Means in the Indian Exegetics

印度训诂学中目的与手段的应用理论研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510023
负责人：
YOSHIMIZU Kiyotaka
金额：
$ 2.3万
依托单位：
Hokkaido University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14510023/
关键词：
Sabara Kumarila Mimamsa injunction hiearchy intention sacrifice Veda 規定文配属 viniyoga

项目摘要

The head investigator of the present research compiled an analysis of the second and the third volume of the Mimamsasutra through the corroboration with three co-investigators. The main results of this study are as follows :1.The main injunction of a Vedic sacrifice issues an order to begin a sacrifice, and this order is transferred to other injunctions of the ritual details that constitute the sacrifice. As a result of this transference, a hierarchical system is formed within the Vedic corpus.2.The view that a periodical sacrifice is a means to attain heaven is compatible with another view that the sacrifice is a duty to be performed. Even if one does not desire heaven, one is bound to perform the sacrifice following the injunction "As long as one is alive, one should perform the sacrifice", which has the authority independent of another injunction "One who desires heaven should perform the sacrifice." This independence is proved on account of exegetic reasons.3.Kumarila distinguishes the aspect of actual performance from the aspect of textual comprehension. He enumerates five kinds of ritual components "not to be integrated" (anupadeya) into one's own performance, i.e., place, time, opportunity, result and the thing to be purified. According to him, the injunction, in principle, presupposes (ud-dis) one of these anupadeya and enjoins (vi-dha) something to be integrated (upadeya).4.To ascertain the textual hierarchy between two ritual components is called "assignment" (viniyoga), which is contrasted with "assistance" (upakara) that is, at least theoretically, observed in the sacrificial place. The theory of assistance is ascribed to Badari, an ancient Mimamsaka who also asserted that the sacrifice does not take effect on the determination of the place where the sacrificer is supposed to be re-born.

本研究的负责人调查员通过了与三个共同投资者的佐证，对Mimamsasutra的第二和第三卷进行了分析。这项研究的主要结果如下：1。吠陀牺牲的主要禁令发出了开始牺牲的命令，该命令转移到构成牺牲的仪式细节的其他禁令中。由于这种转移，在吠陀语料库中形成了层次制度。2。一种定期牺牲是获得天堂的一种手段的观点，即与另一种观点兼容，即牺牲是有责任执行的责任。即使一个人不希望天堂，一个人必然会在禁令“只要活着，应该执行牺牲”之后执行牺牲，这将使权威独立于另一强禁令“渴望天堂的人应该执行牺牲”。 3.Kumarila将实际绩效的方面与文本理解方面区分开来证明这种独立性。他列举了五种仪式组成部分“不要集成”（anupadeya）纳入自己的表演，即地点，时间，机会，结果以及要净化的东西。据他介绍，原则上的禁令是前提（ud-dis）其中的其中一个anupadeya and nudoins（vi-dha）要整合的东西（upadeya）.4。要确定两个仪式组成部分之间的文本层次结构称为“分配”（viniyyoga）（viniyoga），与“ salever”相反，这是“ saffore”（up offore of offore of offore''（up offore of offore of offore of offore''援助理论归因于巴达里（Badari），他还断言，牺牲并没有生效牺牲者应该重生的地方的确定。