权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Historical Study of Citizen's Participation in the Japanese Museum

公民参与日本博物馆的历史研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510316
负责人：
TAKIBATA Mariko
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
Otemon Gakuin University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

First, I examine the history of citizens'participation at Osaka Museum of Natural History, Yokosuka City Museum and Ooisawa Natural Museum. Toshiro Ito proposed that in order for a museum to be public goods, citizens'participation in survey and study should be indispensable. Discussion should be continued about Ito's proposalon public goods : how the citizens that participated in joint surveys or studies organized by museum professionals changed their recognition and actions, and also transformed the museum and the community.Secondly, I criticize two reports presented by the Japanese Association of Museum : "Museum : Conversation & Cooperation", and "Desirable Image of the Museum". As both reports lacked a clear concept of museum, they presented not higher standards but minimum standards. "The standard for the facilities and operation of public museums (Standard 48)" has been revised by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. On the other hand, museums are expected to aim for higher level due to the pressure of evaluation. Museum professionals have long demanded improvements in their working conditions and tax privileges for private museums.Japanese museums have not made their raison d'etre clear in the last 50 years, so they find it difficult to win public patronage. For example, we can consider museum as a system for the redistribution of cultural capital. It isn't sophisticated evaluation that is being looked for at present, but a fundamental examination why museums exist, and how can we make the law or standard for museum management.

首先，我考察了大阪自然史博物馆、横须贺市立博物馆和大泽自然史博物馆的市民参与历史。伊藤敏郎提出，为了使博物馆成为公共产品，公民参与调查和研究是必不可少的。我们应该继续讨论伊藤所提出的公共产品：参与由博物馆专业人员组织的联合调查或研究的公民如何改变他们的认知和行动，同时也改变了博物馆和社区。其次，我对日本博物馆协会提出的两份报告《博物馆：对话与合作》和《博物馆的理想形象》提出批评。由于两份报告都没有明确的博物馆概念，所以提出的不是更高的标准，而是最低的标准。教育文化体育科学技术部对《公共博物馆设施及运行标准（标准48）》进行了修订。另一方面，由于受到评价的压力，博物馆也有可能追求更高的水平。长期以来，博物馆专业人士一直要求改善他们的工作条件，并为私人博物馆提供税收优惠。在过去的50年里，日本的博物馆没有明确自己存在的理由，因此很难赢得公众的赞助。例如，我们可以把博物馆看作是一个文化资本再分配的系统。这并不是目前所追求的复杂的评价，而是对博物馆为什么存在，以及如何制定博物馆管理的法律或标准的根本审视。