权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Polis Integration and Eipgraphic Culture

城邦一体化与印记文化

基本信息

批准号：
14510413
负责人：
MAENO Hiroshi
金额：
$ 1.92万
依托单位：
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The purpose of this paper is to make clear the aspects of the Attic Epigraphic Culture, mainly from the sixth century B.C. to the third century A.D. So far inscriptions have been read as texts. Epigraphists and Historians have thought that inscriptions were read as texts in ancient times and they themselves have read insriptions as such. Therefore their main concern is the contents written in texts. This study however does not simply take inscriptions as texts. But it takes them as one of the vehicles of information and pays attentions to the meaning of the guise, its existence and the social functions. In previous times inscriptions were squeezed away from stelae and read as texts but in this study inscritpions squeezed away will put back to the stelae and the stelae will be set back to the places where they stood. By so doing I tried to read the whole meaning of text information and non-text information on stelae. Conclusions are as follows :1) A stela consists of not only texts but also non-text information such as shape and meterial of stela, placement where thery stood, large letters, ΘEOI, reliefs, and making costs.2) Each of these non-text information has its own grammar like texts and send information. This information however does not always supplement the text information, but has nothing to do with it. Thus on a stela not only public records but also private ulterior motives, ambitions, desire and hope were intertwined.3) Inscriptions were narrated in two different contexts; the Primary Context and the Secondary Context. And often there was a gap between them. Thus inscriptions were not only used for keeping records and sending massage, but also for persuading people, binding people, and direct people to a certanin direction (for integration of people as a polis).

本文的目的是要弄清楚阿提卡铭文文化的各个方面，主要是从公元前世纪到公元前3世纪。金石学家和历史学家认为，在古代，铭文是作为文本阅读的，他们自己也是这样阅读铭文的。因此，他们主要关心的是文本中所写的内容。然而，本研究并不是简单地将铭文视为文本。但它把它们作为信息的载体之一，并关注其存在的意义和社会功能。在以前的时代，铭文被从石碑上挤下来，作为文本阅读，但在本研究中，被挤下来的铭文将被放回石碑，石碑将被放回原来的地方。通过这样做，我试图阅读石碑上的文本信息和非文本信息的全部含义。研究结论如下：1）石碑不仅包含文字信息，还包含石碑形状、材质、放置位置、大字、ΘEOI、浮雕、制作成本等非文字信息; 2）每一种非文字信息都有自己的语法，如文字信息和发送信息。然而，这些信息并不总是补充文本信息，而是与文本信息无关。因此，在石碑上，不仅有公共记录，而且还有私人不可告人的动机，野心，欲望和希望。他们之间往往有差距。因此，铭文不仅用于记录和传递信息，而且还用于说服人们，约束人们，并将人们引向某个方向（将人们整合为城邦）。