Research on the Parental Right of Consent to a medical Treatment of their minor Child.

父母同意未成年子女接受医疗的权利研究。

• 批准号: 14520045
• 负责人: MAEDA Yasushi
• 金额: $ 1.34万
• 依托单位: Gunma University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2002
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2002 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14520045/
• 关键词: Informed Consent; Substituted Judgment; Agency; Parental Right; Guardianship; 法定代理人

Parents (or a parent) of a minor have parental rights for the best interest of the minor child.Parental rights in Japanese Law include property rights as an agency for the minor. Parents of a minor ought to exercise their property rights for the best interest of the minor. They don't have a right to reduce the property of their minor child. Even if they make a contract to give their minor's property to another, such a contract should have no legal effect. Because they don't have that right.Parents of a minor have a right in relation to custody for the best interest of the minor. They ought to take custody for the best interest of their minor child. Also,they ought to exercise this right in medical custody for the best interest of the child.Parents ought to make a medical contract as an agency of their minor child for the best interest of the minor. When the best interest needs the medical contract, parents of the minor must to make this contract. When it needs a consent to the medical treatment for a minor, parents must to consent for the treatment as taking custody. They cannot refuse the medical contract and the medical treatment.

未成年人的父母（或父母一方）为了未成年人的最大利益而享有亲权。日本法律中的亲权包括作为未成年人代理人的财产权。未成年人的父母应当为未成年人的最大利益行使财产权。他们无权减少未成年子女的财产。即使他们订立了将未成年人的财产赠与他人的合同，这种合同也不应具有法律的效力。因为他们没有这个权利。未成年人的父母有权利为了未成年人的最大利益而拥有监护权。为了未成年子女的最大利益，他们应该获得监护权。此外，他们还应该为了儿童的最大利益行使医疗监护权，父母应该为了未成年人的最大利益，作为未成年子女的代理人签订医疗合同。当最大利益需要医疗合同时，未成年人的父母必须订立医疗合同。当需要对未成年人进行医疗治疗征得同意时，父母必须同意以监护方式进行治疗。他们不能拒绝医疗合同和医疗。

项目成果

前田 泰: "判例にあらわれた高齢者の意思能力"老年精神医学. 13巻・10号. 1151-1157 (2002)

Yasushi Maeda：“司法判例中揭示的老年人的故意能力”《老年精神病学》第 13 卷，第 10 期。1151-1157 (2002)

前田 泰: "財産法における「能力」"西山詮・新井誠編『意思能力と成年後見』日本評論社. 47-69 (2002)

Yasushi Maeda：“物权法中的‘能力’”，Akira Nishiyama 和 Makoto Arai（编辑），《意志能力和成人监护权》，Nippon Hyoronsha 47-69 (2002)。

Yasushi Maeda: "Legal Issue on Judgment of Capacity."Guardian. No.6. 57-68 (2003)

前田靖：“关于能力判断的法律问题”。卫报。

前田 泰: "能力判定の法的課題と展望"実践成年後見. 6号. 57-68 (2003)

Yasushi Maeda：“能力确定的法律问题和前景”《实用成人监护》6 第 57-68 期（2003 年）。

前田 泰: "意思能力の判定と本人の保護"小林先生古稀記念論集『財産法諸問題の課題』(酒井書店). 47-78 (2004)

前田康：“意志能力的确定和人身保护”小林教授的“财产法问题”集（堺书店）47-78（2004年）。