Doctrinal evaluation of both application and development of the environmental valuation method in environmental economics, and its database making

本研究的主要内容如下：1）通过对英国著名学者的访谈，收集了环境价值评估方面的信息、参考资料和数据（欧洲生态经济学会主席C.Spash，R. T. Turner：CSERGE负责人）2）通过HET的会议，姬野获得了环境经济学的框架知识（经济思想史）和INEM通过对伊沙亚潮滩和围垦的CVM和CONJOINT调查，验证了环境评价方法的可行性。5）借鉴演化经济学、批判现实主义和艾森的理论，澄清了“CVM”研究中混淆“消费者选择”和“公民选择”的“范畴错误”。6）在PC上建立了CVM和CM（Choice 'modeling）的参考书数据库。

The outline of the research project is as follows.1)Himeno collected the information, reference and data about environment valuation through the interviews to eminent researchers in UK (C.Spash Chair of the European Society for ecological economics, R.T.Turner : Head of CSERGE).2)Himeno got the knowledge about the framework of environmental economics through the conference of HET (History of Economic Thought) and INEM(International Network for Economic Method) in UK.3)Through the CVM and CONJOINT investigation for Isahaya tidal flat and reclamation, Himeno had checked the feasibility of evaluation method.4)The methods of environmental valuation were re-examined according to their own character, effect and fault.5)The "category mistake" was clarified on reference to the Evolutionary Economics, the Critical Realism and A Sen, in confusion of "consumer selection" with "citizen selection" in "CVM investigation.6)Database of the reference books for both CVM and CM (Choice 'modeling ) were made on PC.