权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Studies on the Prehistoric Human Settlement and Fauna between Japan ad France

日法史前人居及动物区系比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
16320109
负责人：
INADA Takashi
金额：
$ 4.86万
依托单位：
OKYAMA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1 Studying the Paleolithic human settlement and fauna in the Japanese Archipelago(a)Excavations at Tarumi NT cave in the 2004 and 2005 seasons uncovered a number of animal bones belonging to Middle Pleistocene. (b) T.Inada, Y.Kawamura and H.Taruno published a report on an aquatic sediment named the Hatahokogawa formation in Iki island, and its Late Pleistocene mammals. (c) In order to study Paleolithic human settlement, T. Inada analyzed several ring-shaped features of artifact clusters, and assumed that such features was not temporarily formed by several human groups gathering for hunting big game, but resulted from the settling of a human group who lived together for a long time, moving from one camp to the next.2 Paleolithic human settlement and fauna in France and Switzerland(a)Using the results of analyses on the different types of hunting, the seasons of occupation, hearth types etc. at the site of Verberie and Champreveyres as a reference, F.Audouze argues that the residential m … More obility of the Magdalenian peoples in the Paris Basin presents some similarity with the residential mobility of foragers. (b) D.Leesch shows that the Magdalenian closed combustion system was adapted to the kind of locally available ligneous combustible. M.-I.Cattin discusses four models about the ways by which the lithic raw materials were transported to the Neuchatel region from the northern and southern sources.3 Comparative studies on the Prehistoric human settlement and fauna between Japan and FranceT.Inada carried forward this theme whose results are as follow : (a) There was a shift toward more mobile small groups in France, in contrast to Japan where sedentarization increased from the final Pleistocene to the beginning of the Holocene. (b) In contrast to the case of Champreveyres, the Hinatabayasi B site was formed by a foraging group. (c) Using the hunting sites in Europe as a reference, the Paleolithic pit falls uncovered in Japan were not used for hunting by driving games. (d)Japanese lithic industry derives from a parallel structure model whereas Europian lithic industry represents a simple structure model. Less

1研究日本群岛的旧石器时代人类聚居地和动物群(A)2004年和2005年在Tarumi NT洞穴的发掘发现了一些属于中更新世的动物骨骼。(B)T.Inada、Y.Kawamura和H.Taruno发表了一份关于Iki岛名为Hatahokogawa组的水生沉积物及其晚更新世哺乳动物的报告。(C)为了研究旧石器时代人类聚落，稻田分析了人工制品群的几个环形特征，并假设这种特征不是几个人类群体聚集在一起狩猎大型猎物暂时形成的，而是一个长期居住的人类群体从一个营地迁移到下一个营地的结果。2法国和瑞士的旧石器时代人类聚落和动物群落(A)利用对Verberie和Champreveyres遗址不同狩猎类型、占领季节、壁炉类型等的分析结果作为参考，F.Audouze认为，…巴黎盆地马格达勒尼亚人的更多机动性与觅食者的居住流动性有一些相似之处。(B)D.Leesch指出，马格达林封闭燃烧系统适用于当地可获得的木质可燃物。M.-I.Cattin讨论了关于石质原料从北部和南部来源运输到Neuchatel地区的四种模式。3对日本和法国史前人类聚居地和动物群的比较研究。稻田发扬了这一主题，其结果如下：(A)法国转向流动性更强的小群体，与日本相反，日本从最后更新世到全新世初定居增加。(B)与Champreveyres的情况不同，Hinatabayasi B遗址是由一个觅食小组组成的。(三)参考欧洲的狩猎地点，在日本发现的旧石器时代的坑形瀑布并非用作驾驶游戏进行狩猎。(D)日本石材产业是从平行结构模式衍生出来的，而欧洲石材产业则是一种简单结构模式。较少