权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Anglo-American Modernism and the Representations of the Pacific

英美现代主义与太平洋的表现

基本信息

批准号：
16520137
负责人：
OTA Nobuyoshi
金额：
$ 2.27万
依托单位：
Tokyo Gakugei University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

There has been renewed interest in rethinking the problematics of modernism and imperialism within recent literary and cultural studies of English modernism. Besides critical examinations of the center/metropolis and the periphery/colony, fresh approaches to the decentered organization of the empire and its culture are being explored, at least in part owing to (post)colonial theory, and in part owing to the present process of new imperial globalization. For example, as my review article in T. S. Eliot Review shows, Jed Esty in A Shrinking Island: Modernism and National Culture in England locates high-modernist literature in the larger historical formation of national culture in England, in which the joint eclipse of modernist aesthetics and British expansionist power is traced from the new concern of the 1930s with the insular integrity of the nation through the emergence of cultural studies in the 1950s. Especially focusing on the late modernist texts of Virginia Woolf's Between the A … More cts and T. S. Eliot's Four Quartets, Esty's subtle and shrewd readings reveal that, despite the seemingly fatal effects of declining empire on modernist form, the survivors of the modernist writers participate in the transition from empire to welfare state, from metropolitan art to national culture. While I agree with Esty's contention that the imperial culture of English modernism survives and continues to define the cultural and political meaning of Englishness after the seeming death of liberal England, I find problematic his facile and even overhasty metaphorization between the shrinking of the British Empire (and its culture) and the decline of Europe as the center of reference.I have argued in "The Culture of Empire and Englishness" that, while the shrinking island of England, Esty presumes, becomes "the governing figure for a paradigmatically English end to the triumph of European civilization," the representation of contracted England in the inter-war period cannot simply be identified with the spatial closure of Europe's hegemonic advancement and the rise of new empire, America. My next article "The (Re)formations of Empire and Lawrence" has also suggested the important role of the global nature of English imperialism within the literary modernist texts of D. H. Lawrence, arguing that the structural meaning of Women in Love and Kangaroo should be interpreted the transnational rearticulations and reformations of the British Empire in connection with the new empire of America, thereby the cultural Otherness of the Asian immigrants being disclosed beneath the textual surfaces. Finally, from the somewhat different viewpoint of the political culture of Thatcherism, the variously contradictory nature of the "special relationships" between Britain and America has been reexamined in "The 'Decline' of the British Empire and Americanization."Thus, this research project is concerned with various relationships between Britain and America in Anglo-American modernist texts. I have been arguing that the structure of Angro-American literature within the inter-war period determines and is overdetermined by the absent presence of the Pacific as the cultural Other. Less

近年来，在对英国现代主义的文学和文化研究中，人们重新对现代主义和帝国主义的问题产生了兴趣。除了对中心/大都会和边缘/殖民地的批判性考察之外，人们还在探索帝国及其文化的去中心化组织的新方法，至少部分是由于（后）殖民理论，部分是由于当前新帝国全球化的进程。例如，正如我在T. S.《艾略特评论》认为，杰德·埃斯蒂在《一个收缩的岛屿：英国的现代主义与民族文化》中将高级现代主义文学置于英国民族文化的历史大格局中，从20世纪30年代对民族的孤立完整性的新关注到20世纪50年代文化研究的兴起，现代主义美学与英国扩张主义势力的共同衰落被追溯到了这一历史大格局中。特别是对弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的《在A之间》这部晚期现代主义文本的分析 ...更多信息 cts和T. S.通过对艾略特《四个四重奏》的解读，埃斯蒂敏锐地发现，尽管帝国衰落对现代主义形式产生了致命的影响，但现代主义作家的幸存者参与了从帝国到福利国家、从都市艺术到民族文化的转变。虽然我同意埃斯蒂的论点，即英国现代主义的帝国文化在自由主义的英国似乎死亡之后仍然存在，并继续定义英国性的文化和政治意义，我认为他把大英帝国的萎缩与（及其文化）和欧洲作为参考中心的衰落。我曾在《帝国与英格兰性的文化》中论证过，虽然英格兰这个不断缩小的岛屿，埃斯蒂假定，尽管英国成为“欧洲文明胜利的典型英国式结局的统治人物”，但两次世界大战之间英国的收缩表现不能简单地等同于欧洲霸权进步的空间封闭和新帝国美国的崛起。我的下一篇文章《帝国与劳伦斯的（重组）》也提出了英国帝国主义的全球性在D。H.劳伦斯认为，《恋爱中的女人》和《袋鼠》的结构意义应被解读为大英帝国与美洲新帝国之间的跨国重组和改造，从而揭示出隐藏在文本表面之下的亚洲移民的文化认同。最后，《大英帝国的“衰落”与美国化》从撒切尔主义政治文化的不同视角重新审视了英美“特殊关系”的各种矛盾本质。因此，本研究项目关注英美现代主义文本中英美之间的各种关系。我一直认为，两次世界大战期间英美文学的结构决定了太平洋作为文化他者的缺席，并且被过度决定。少

项目成果

期刊论文数量（15）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

D.H. Lawrence : Literature, History, Culture

D.H.劳伦斯：文学、历史、文化

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
武藤浩史;Hiroshi Muto;Hiroshi Muto;武藤浩史;武藤浩史(Hiroshi Muto);武藤浩史;Hiroshi Muto;武藤浩史;武藤浩史;武藤浩史;Hiroshi Muto;Hiroshi Muto;武藤浩史;Hiroshi Muto (co-written);武藤浩史;武藤浩史;武藤浩史
通讯作者：
武藤浩史

帝国の文化、あるいは、エリオットとウルフのモダニズム文学史?

帝国文化还是艾略特和伍尔夫的现代主义文学史？