权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Syntactic Representation of Verbal Aspect : A Study based on English, the Tokyo Dialect and the Northern Kyushu Dialect

言语体的句法表征:基于英语、东京方言和北九州方言的研究

基本信息

批准号：
16520251
负责人：
URUSHIBARA Saeko
金额：
$ 2.25万
依托单位：
The University of Kitakyushu
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Based on Vendler-Dowty verbal classification, I made comparison among the forms of progressive and perfect aspects of the Tokyo dialect, the Northern Kyushu dialect, English and Korean. As a result, the Northern Kyushu dialect, which has two distinct forms for these aspects, behaves similarly with English in interpretation. In particular, a near-future interpretation of achievement verb plus "progressive morpheme, is absent in the Tokyo dialect but existent in the Northern Kyushu dialect and English. This is precisely due to the fact that while these languages have two distinct forms for progressive and perfect, the Tokyo dialect has only one form -te i-ru. Adopting Ritter and Rosen's mechanism of syntactic representation, I proposed a mechanism for licensing such aspects in terms of syntaxI made a detailed analysis on the peculiar existence of progressives and perfects of so-called "stateverbs" in the sense of Kindaichi (1976), and argued that by positing an event position associated with some "event nominals" and a mechanism of "event transfer" to these verbs, we can explain these facts.In addition, Korean ess expresses past tense, perfect aspect, or evidentiality aspect, depending on the class of verb it attaches to. Through further comparison between these languages and the Tohoku dialect of Japanese, it has become clear that there is a division of labor between tense, aspect and modality in relation with existence/absence of particular forms. Specifically, Korean and the Tohoku dialect share a common characteristics of doubling of past tense, which shows indirect evidentiality.These results were presented at the International Conference of the Linguistic Society of Korea, the 22nd Annual Conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan, and the 11th and 12th Harvard International Symposium on Korean Linguistics.

基于Vendler-Dowty词性分类，对东京方言、九州北部方言、英语和韩语的进行和完成方面的形式进行了比较。因此，在这些方面有两种不同形式的北九州方言在解释上与英语相似。特别是，东京方言中没有成就动词加“进行语素”的近将来解释，但在北九州方言和英语中存在。这正是由于这些语言有进行和完成两种不同的形式，而东京方言只有一种形式- i-ru。我采用Ritter和Rosen的句法表征机制，从句法上提出了一种许可这些方面的机制，并对Kindaichi（1976）意义上的所谓“状态动词”的进行时和完成时的特殊存在进行了详细的分析，认为通过设定与某些“事件名词性”相关联的事件位置和对这些动词的“事件转移”机制，我们可以解释这些事实。此外，根据动词的类别，韩国语的ess表示过去时、完成时或证据性时。通过对这些语言和日本东北方言的进一步比较，我们可以清楚地看到，在特定形式的存在/缺失方面，时态、方面和情态之间存在着分工。具体来说，朝鲜语和东北话有一个共同的特点，即过去时的重复，这显示了间接证据。该结果发表在韩国语言学会国际学术会议、日本英语语言学会第22届年会、美国哈佛大学第11届、第12届韩国语言学国际学术会议上。