权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The transformation of contemporary American liberalism and the revision of "Minority Rights" Theories: Theoretical and practical consequences of "Liberalism Debate"

当代美国自由主义的转型与“少数人权利”理论的修正：“自由主义之争”的理论与实践后果

基本信息

批准号：
17530109
负责人：
IIDA Fumio
金额：
$ 1.82万
依托单位：
Kobe University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2005
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2005 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This research first examined the recent developments of minority rights theories and their critics. It revealed that the recent writings of major minority rights theorists such as Kymlicka are heavily influenced by recent theory of Iris Young, who attempts to include identity claims of woman, elderly people and handicapped. The research also attempted to show that a workable differentiation of recent objections to minority rights argument can be classified into rights-based objections, basic rights objections, and equality objections, respectively. Finally, it also found out that the recent theories of minority rights seem to share some common grounds with the theories of deliberative democracies and theories of citizenship since minority theorists today are really keen to secure social integration.Second, this research also attempted to compare the features of contemporary American minority rights arguments with those of minority theories of different times and places. It found out that contemporary American arguments have significant affinities with those of inter-war America and Britain who also suffered from conflicts among minority cultures. It also found out that contemporary American arguments have affinities with postwar Japanese liberal arguments in the sense that both of these arguments have serious concerns with diversity and pluralities.

本研究首先审查了少数群体权利理论及其批评者的最新发展。它表明，Kymlicka等主要少数群体权利理论家最近的著作深受Iris Young最近理论的影响，该理论试图包括妇女、老年人和残疾人的身份主张。研究还试图表明，一个可行的区分最近的反对少数人权利的论点可以分为基于权利的反对，基本权利的反对，平等的反对，分别。最后，本研究还发现，由于当今少数民族理论家们确实热衷于确保社会融合，因此近年来的少数民族权利理论似乎与协商民主理论和公民权理论有着某些共同点。其次，本研究还试图将当代美国少数民族权利理论的特点与不同时代和不同地区的少数民族理论的特点进行比较。它发现，当代美国的论点有显着的亲和力与战争期间的美国和英国谁也遭受少数民族文化之间的冲突。它还发现，当代美国的论点与战后日本的自由主义论点有密切的联系，因为这两种论点都对多样性和多元性有着严重的关注。