Developing a Cross-Cultural Model for Explaining Differences in Argument Structures

开发一个跨文化模型来解释论证结构的差异

• 批准号: 18520418
• 负责人: SUZUKI Shinobu
• 金额: $ 0.86万
• 依托单位: Hokkaido University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2006 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-18520418/
• 关键词: argument structures; communication; 異文化コミュニケーション

This project has two major purposes: (a) to find out an effective way of understanding structural features of informal argument and (b) to examine variables that explain differences in the structural features of informal argument. To accomplish the goals, arguments written by college students on controversial issues were collected and analyzed. The following are the major findings of this project.(1) It was found that Suzuki's argument coding scheme (2005, 2006) is capable of describing informal written arguments with an acceptable reliability of above.8. (2) The following indicators describe argument features successfully: (a) two horizontal micro structural indicators, which include spoke and chain horizontal micro structures, (b) two vertical micro structural indicators, which include serial and compound micro reasoning structures, and c two macro structural indicators, which include climactic-anticlimactic and horizontal-vertical macro structures. (3) For the Japanese sample, the model proposed in this study can explain the relationships between the variables (argumentativeness and involvement) and the use of structural indicators in written arguments. (4) There appears to be relationships between culture, self-construal, and argumentativeness, which may provide a reason why people from different cultures differ in the way they construct argument.

该项目有两个主要目的：（a）找到理解非正式论证结构特征的有效方法；（b）检查解释非正式论证结构特征差异的变量。为了实现这些目标，收集并分析了大学生关于有争议问题的论点。以下是该项目的主要发现。(1)发现铃木的论点编码方案(2005,2006)能够以可接受的上述可靠性描述非正式的书面论点。8． (2)以下指标成功地描述了论证特征：(a)两个横向微观结构指标，包括辐条和链状横向微观结构；(b)两个纵向微观结构指标，包括串行和复合微观推理结构；c两个宏观结构指标，包括高潮-反高潮和水平-垂直宏观结构。 （3）对于日本样本，本研究提出的模型可以解释变量（论证性和参与性）之间的关系以及书面论证中结构指标的使用。 (4) 文化、自我建构和争论性之间似乎存在关系，这可能是不同文化背景的人们在构建争论的方式上存在差异的原因。

项目成果

Gender-linked differences in informal argument: Analyzing arguments in an online newspaper

非正式争论中与性别相关的差异：分析在线报纸中的争论

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: Women's Studies in Communication 29
• 作者: HASEGAWA Noriko;TSUTSUMI Ryoichi;鈴木 志のぶ;Shinobu Suzuki
• 通讯作者: Shinobu Suzuki

What explains argument structures?: Examining arguments constructedby Japanese college students

什么解释论证结构？：检查日本大学生构造的论证

• 发表时间: 2007
• 作者: HASEGAWA Noriko;TSUTSUMI Ryoichi;鈴木 志のぶ;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki;鈴木志のぶ;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki
• 通讯作者: Shinobu Suzuki

日本語学習者によるアーギュメントの特徴-上級・超級者間の差異-

日本学习者的论证特点 - 高级学习者和高级学习者之间的差异 -

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 『スピーチ・コミュニケーション教育』 19
• 作者: HASEGAWA Noriko;TSUTSUMI Ryoichi;鈴木 志のぶ
• 通讯作者: 鈴木 志のぶ

Differences in argument structures between advanced and superior learners of Japanese

高级日语学习者和高级日语学习者之间论证结构的差异

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: Speech Communication Education vol.19
• 作者: HASEGAWA Noriko;TSUTSUMI Ryoichi;鈴木 志のぶ;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki
• 通讯作者: Shinobu Suzuki

日本語学習者によるアーギュメントの特徴-上級・超級者の差異

日本学习者的论证特点 - 高级学习者和高级学习者之间的差异

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: スピーチ・コミュニケーション研究 19
• 作者: HASEGAWA Noriko;TSUTSUMI Ryoichi;鈴木 志のぶ;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki;Shinobu Suzuki;鈴木志のぶ
• 通讯作者: 鈴木志のぶ