Evaluation and Monitoring of Social Welfare Council in Consolidation of Municipalities.

社会福利理事会在城市合并中的评估和监督。

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    18530445
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    日本
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
  • 财政年份:
    2006
  • 资助国家:
    日本
  • 起止时间:
    2006 至 2007
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

The merger of the self-governing body was over by 2007, and a lot of new Social Welfare Council in were born. On the occasion of merger, there is doubt whether each social welfare council adjusted the business to by a clear method. It was an aim that community-social welfare was active for a small area, but, by merger of a self-governing body, the territory became wider.If merger was carried out without adjustment of the business, the Social Welfare Council cannot sponsor satisfactory service for inhabitants.The merger of the self-governing body can expect that it continues for ten years from now on. I have to establish the adjustment method of the business not to decrease the welfare standard of inhabitants because a self-governing body merges it.This study investigates the actual situation of the merger of the Social Welfare Council and proposes an ideal method of the business adjustment.[The concrete method of the study]I conducted next investigation in a social welfare meeting and the object which I merged in Hokkaido and Tohoku after 2000 to achieve the purpose of the study.(1) Investigated the needs of inhabitants properly?(2) Did the social welfare council argue enough?(3)How did the needs of inhabitants change after having merged it?[Findings](1) They did not coordinate the business with enough needs investigation before a social welfare council of 68.8% merged it.(2) The social welfare council of 33.3% did not make a community-based welfare plan.[Conclusion]The merger of the self-governing body can expect that it continues for ten years from now on. I think it is important that establish the adjustment method of the business when a social welfare meeting merges it.
2007年自治机构合并结束,一批新的社会福利理事会诞生。在合并之际,各社会福利理事会是否以明确的方式调整业务存在疑问。其目标是在小范围内积极开展地区社会福利工作,但通过自治体的合并,领土变得更加广阔。如果不调整业务而进行合并,社会福利会议就无法为居民提供满意的服务。自治体的合并可以期待从现在开始持续10年。为了不因自治体的合并而降低居民的福利标准,必须制定事业的调整方法。本研究调查了社会福利协议会合并的实际情况,提出了理想的事业调整方法。[研究的具体方法]为了实现社会福利会议的目的,在社会福利会议上进行了下一步的调查,并对北海道和东北地区的合并对象进行了研究。 研究。(1)对居民的需求进行了适当的调查?(2)社会福利理事会的争论是否充分?(3)合并后居民的需求发生了怎样的变化?[调查结果](1)在68.8%的社会福利理事会合并之前,他们没有进行足够的需求调查来协调业务。(2)33.3%的社会福利理事会没有制定社区福利计划。[结论]合并 预计自治机构的这种做法将持续十年。我认为,社会福利会议合并时,制定业务的调整办法是很重要的。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Analyzed the Satisfaction of Inhabitants in Community Welfare
居民对社区福利的满意度分析
市町村社会福祉協議会の合併に関する調査研究
市级社会福利理事会合并研究
地域福祉活動の住民満足度分析に関する研究
社区福利活动居民满意度分析研究
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2006
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Takako;Suzuki;鈴木 孝子;鈴木 孝子;増子 正;増子 正
  • 通讯作者:
    増子 正
新しい地域福祉推進の理論と実際
新区域福利促进的理论与实践
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2007
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Tadashi;MASUKO;都築 光一
  • 通讯作者:
    都築 光一
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

MASUKO Tadashi其他文献

MASUKO Tadashi的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('MASUKO Tadashi', 18)}}的其他基金

Analysis of Role and Function of the Community Chest as a Community Fund to Support Community Welfare.
公益金作为支持社区福利的社区基金的作用和功能分析。
  • 批准号:
    22530617
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 资助金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Astudy of using the benchmark technique for monitoring and evaluation of the Community welfare plan.
使用基准技术监测和评估社区福利计划的研究。
  • 批准号:
    15530374
  • 财政年份:
    2003
  • 资助金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

相似海外基金

Theoretical Reorganization of Public-Private Secter Collaboration-Consumer Groups, Social Welfare Council, DV Support Groups
公私部门合作的理论重组——消费者团体、社会福利委员会、DV支持团体
  • 批准号:
    15K03091
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Contemporary significance and issues of social welfare council - Focusing on role in community welfare plan
社会福利理事会的当代意义与问题——聚焦社区福利计划中的作用
  • 批准号:
    26380051
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
A Study of Community Welfare Assessment Conducted by Municipal Administration and Social Welfare Council on Community Welfare Planning
市政当局和社会福利委员会对社区福利规划进行社区福利评估的研究
  • 批准号:
    25380797
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 2.34万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了