Explorations on the "ratio bias" paradox in decision making

“比率偏差”指的是人类心理学中的一种系统性逻辑反常。当她关于百分比的大小判断与关于组合整数的分数的逻辑等价判断不一致时，一个人就会表现出比率偏差。山西(1997年)的S的实验参与者在被告知癌症致死的“10000人中有1286人”比被告知“百人中有24.14人”时，对癌症风险的评价更危险。本研究旨在建立解释这些现象的理论框架，并为风险沟通提供应用处方。这一理论名为“双重韦伯-费克纳理论”，发表在随后的列表中的第4期期刊上。在文章4的延伸中讨论沟通研究的论文包括论文1、3和4。它们还继承了第6、7和8条所阐述的关于言语沟通的见解。最后，文章2提供了癌症患者和医生之间的风险沟通设置的应用工作。从而完成了研究提案阶段的目标。

"The ratio bias" denotes a systematic logical anomaly in human psychology. One exhibits a ratio bias whenever her magnitude judgments pertaining to percentages show inconsistencies with logically equivalent judgments pertaining to fractions by combined integers. Yamagishi (1997)'s experimental participants rated risk of cancer as more dangerous when instructed that cancer kills "1286 people out of 10000" than when told "24.14 out of 100." This research program aimed at establishing theoretical framework to explain such phenomena, as well as providing applied prescription for risk communication. The theory, "dual Weber-Fechner Theory," appeared in journal the article 4 in the subsequent list. Papers discussing communication research in extension of the article 4 include papers 1, 3, and 4. They also inherit insights in verbal communications set forth by articles 6, 7, and 8. Finally, the article 2 offers applied work in the setting of risk communication between cancer patients and medical practitioners. Thusly this investigation accomplished the objectives in the research proposal stage.