Role of the Russian Orthodoxy in Cultural Integration of the Russian Empire during the 19th century.

19世纪上半叶的俄罗斯东正教神学没有足够的使命感来构建俄罗斯东正教的原始辩证法，从而促进了俄罗斯帝国的文化融合。此外，总的来说，许多创造性的神学家都与帝国的世俗力量保持了距离。在19世纪70年代及以后，开始为俄罗斯东正教建造最初的辩护者。此外，大约从1905年开始，一种可能与俄罗斯东正教的独特性和当代情况相匹配的辩证法系统化开始定向。在这种背景下，改革派神学家对过于保守的原则和俄罗斯东正教右翼的种族中心主义越来越感到危机感，世俗青年学生对神学的兴趣也越来越大。然而，与西欧的辩证法文学相比，俄罗斯东正教作为与非信仰者进行具体对话的回路的辩证法文学的质量和数量都非常有限。俄罗斯东正教神学家的思潮并不一定是铁板一块的，他们之间存在着严重的冲突。因此，总的来说，俄罗斯东正教神学家积极参与促进俄罗斯帝国的文化融合进程的努力非常薄弱，这一进程是由多教派和多民族居民组成的。

Russian Orthodox theology in the first half of the 19th century did not have adequate sense of a mission to build the original apologetics of Russian Orthodoxy, which promoted the cultural integration of the Russian Empire. Moreover, in general, many creative theologians had distanced themselves from the secular power of the Empire. In the 1870s and later, construction of the original apologetics for the Russian Orthodox Church began to be undertaken. Moreover, a systematization of apologetics that might match the uniqueness of Russian Orthodoxy and the contemporary situation came to be oriented beginning approximately from1905. In the background, there arose a growing sense of crisis amongst reformative theologians about excessively conservative principles and the ethnocentrism of the right wing in the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as an increased interest in theology among secular youth students. However, compared with the apologetics literature of western Europe-the quality and quantity of apologetics literature of Russian Orthodoxy, as a circuit of specific dialogue with non-believers-was very limited. The trend of thought of Russian Orthodox theologianswas not necessarily monolithic, and there were several serious conflicts among them. Thus, in general, the efforts of theologians of Russian Orthodoxy to actively engage in promoting the process of cultural integration of the Russian Empire, which consistedof multiconfessional and multiethnic habitants, were very weak.