Organization of Yanaghita Kunio's Folklore Studies in 1920s'

从一开始，Minzoku就同时遵循两项政策，代表了两位不同的学者，他们是该杂志的编辑。亚纳吉塔·库尼奥征集了当地历史专家的田野调查报告，而他的继任者大阪正雄则介绍了西方文化人类学家的发现。亚纳吉塔担心当地历史学家的详细发现会被视为文化人类学，并导致民俗学领域受到侵蚀和侵蚀。这个问题最早出现在大正时代末期，并在第二次世界大战后重新出现，当时石田英一郎提议通过将其纳入文化人类学来为民俗学家注入新的生命。

From its very beginnings, Minzoku has followed two policies in tandem, typified bay two different scholars who were editors of the journal. Yanaghita Kunio soliceted fieldwork reports on localities bay local history experts, while his successor, Oka masao, introduced the findings of Western cultural anthropologists. Yanaghita feared that the detailed findings of local historians would be seen as cultural antropology and result in the field of folkloristics being encroached upon and eroded. This issue first arose at the end of Taisho era and was revived following the Secound World War upon Ishida Eiichiro's proposal to breathe new life into folklorists by making it a part of cultural anthropology.