Organization of Yanaghita Kunio's Folklore Studies in 1920s'

从一开始，Minzoku就遵循两种政策，典型的是两位不同的学者谁是杂志的编辑。柳下邦雄向当地历史专家征集关于地方的田野调查报告，而他的继任者冈正雄则介绍了西方文化人类学家的发现。柳田担心当地历史学家的详细发现会被视为文化人类学，并导致民俗学领域被侵犯和侵蚀。这一问题最初出现在大正时代末期，第二次世界大战后，石田荣一郎提出将民俗学纳入文化人类学，为民俗学家注入新的活力。

From its very beginnings, Minzoku has followed two policies in tandem, typified bay two different scholars who were editors of the journal. Yanaghita Kunio soliceted fieldwork reports on localities bay local history experts, while his successor, Oka masao, introduced the findings of Western cultural anthropologists. Yanaghita feared that the detailed findings of local historians would be seen as cultural antropology and result in the field of folkloristics being encroached upon and eroded. This issue first arose at the end of Taisho era and was revived following the Secound World War upon Ishida Eiichiro's proposal to breathe new life into folklorists by making it a part of cultural anthropology.