A research of Taiwan's criminal justice reform based on comparative law --- focusing on the optimization of investigation and interrogation

虽然与日本一样，台湾也有过分强调供词的倾向，但在1998年修订刑事诉讼法时，引入了一项新政策，要求对警察和检察机关的审讯进行录音。对整个审讯过程的录音现在在实践层面上被视为理所当然的事情。然而，这并不意味着违约行为已经完全根除。因此，侦查报告的可采性问题仍然是刑事诉讼中存在的一个问题。从这个意义上说，如何对待不符合新政策的调查报告成为一个值得关注的问题。另一方面，没有证据表明审讯过程的“可视化”使嫌疑犯难以招供，也没有证据表明实行这一政策有任何不利之处。

Although, like Japan, there is a tendency to overemphasize confession in Taiwan, during the revision to the code of criminal procedure in 1998, a new policy was introduced which requires recording of the interrogation conducted by the police and the prosecution. The recording of the full process of interrogation is now taken as a matter of course at the practice level. However, it does not mean that breach of duty had been completely eradicated. Therefore the admissibility of the investigation report is still an issue during the criminal litigation when a breach of duty occurs. In that sense, how to treat the investigation report that failed to follow the new policy has become a matter of concern. On the other hand, there is no proof that the "visualization" of the interrogation process had made it difficult for suspects to confess, and there is no evidence to suggest any disadvantage by introducing this policy.